Category: CSG in the News

New coalition wants a better ride for I-270 commuters

A political, civic and business coalition launched a campaign Monday to build support for what one leader described as “transformative” change along traffic-choked Interstate 270 in Maryland.

For their campaign kickoff, the group was savvy about picking a backdrop: They positioned themselves atop a slope in Germantown leading down to the highway. Through the wrap-up of their news conference about 9:15 a.m., the southbound traffic remained heavy and slow heading to the Capital Beltway, 16 miles away.

The coalition wants to revive dormant state studies that could lead to the addition of express toll lanes, which could manage traffic and also provide lane space and financial support for a regional rapid bus system. The regional buses would provide a limited stop service between Frederick and Rock Spring Park in the North Bethesda area, offering connections along the way to other transit and bus services. The coalition also supports construction of a local rapid bus system, known as the Corridor Cities Transitway, to link centers of activity between Shady Grove and Clarksburg.

Also part of this long-range plan for the corridor are a variety of other transit, cycling, pedestrian and road upgrades.

The costs of this long-range program would be in the billions of dollars. Supporters are looking to the express lane tolling as a key source of revenue. Several advocates pointed to Virginia’s network of high-occupancy toll lanes, partly financed by enlisting private partners to build the HOT lanes in exchange for the right to collect the toll revenue.

“It’s time for us to think of this situation in a transformative manner,” said Rep. John Delaney (D-Md.), the honorary chairman of Fix270NOW. Incremental fixes won’t work for such a big people-moving problem, he said. “We’ve been thinking small-ball for too long.”

Richard Parsons, vice chairman of the Suburban Maryland Transportation Alliance, a business and civic advocacy group with parallel interests, said the new coalition welcomes the plan presented by Gov. Larry Hogan (R) to award $100 million for innovative congestion management programs on I-270. The coalition’s theme is that I-270, the main stem of the suburban technology corridor as well as the key route for thousands of commuters headed to and from the region’s core, needs much more help than that.

In Maryland’s transportation planning system, local government support for projects is a prominent element in state financing decisions. So the Fix270NOW group wants to get a clear statement from the Montgomery and Frederick County governments that the improvement of I-270 is a top transportation priority. Once that status is clear, the group wants the Maryland Department of Transportation to revive work on two studies, now many years old, that looked into travel solutions for I-270 and the west side of the Capital Beltway in Maryland.

“It’s time to finish those studies,” said Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), who also spoke in support of the new group.

The Commonwealth Transportation Board, Virginia’s top policymaking panel on transportation, has expressed interest in engaging Maryland in a discussion of cross-Potomac transportation improvements. Some advocates for congestion relief say it would be logical to extend Virginia’s Capital Beltway HOT lanes from the Tysons area across the Legion Bridge and north to I-270.

But the Hogan administration has been cool to this idea. During an online discussion with Dr. Gridlock readers in July, state Transportation Secretary Pete K. Rahn noted that “in Virginia and Maryland, these express toll lanes require substantial upfront state investment into the projects that will typically not be recovered.”

“Congestion-busting solutions” — a term Rahn applied to multi-billion-dollar programs that take many years to complete — can’t be supported by the financial resources available in Maryland, he said.

Maryland has built several express tolling systems in recent years. The Intercounty Connector in Montgomery and Prince George’s features all-electronic tolling at rates that vary with the time of day. Last year, the state opened the I-95 Express Toll Lanes in the middle of I-95 north of Baltimore, using a tolling system similar to that on the ICC.

But Maryland has nothing quite like the Virginia HOT lanes, which vary the tolls based on the level of traffic to maintain steady speeds and offer a free ride to carpoolers using a specialized type of E-ZPass called the Flex.

Parsons said that once the state studies were revived, transportation planners could review what type of express lanes might work best on I-270.

Stewart Schwartz, executive director of the Coalition for Smarter Growth, was skeptical of the express lanes approach for I-270. “Widened highways in metropolitan areas can fill up again in as little as five years,” he said in a statement Monday.

Instead, Schwartz recommended extending the I-270 HOV lane to the Legion Bridge, expanding MARC commuter train service from Frederick, enhancing commuter bus service in the I-270 corridor and encouraging development around transit centers.

Image courtesy of Robert Thomson.

Click here to view the original article.

An early report card on D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser’s affordable housing efforts

Lowering housing costs requires more than writing a check, and come the 2018 election Mayor Muriel E. Bowser may be judged more on her ability to simultaneously work with — and regulate — housing developers than on her $100 million annual commitment.

After all, Bowser isn’t the first D.C. mayor to propose a major increase in housing spending; her predecessor, Vincent C. Gray, also proposed putting $100 million annually into the city’s Housing Production Trust Fund.

Plus, because developers also play a central role in funding city political campaigns, Bowser’s toeing of the line between advocating for poor residents and facilitating new projects often comes under close scrutiny.

What decisions have shaped Bowser’s housing record so far? Here are three.

Get the money out faster: Trust fund dollars typically fill financing gaps for projects relying on a bevy of other public and private sources. For the District to effectively spend $100 million a year, the private market must submit timely, appropriate projects.

Under Gray, there was not a large enough pool of developers to consistently bring quality projects.

“We were seeing the same names as the sponsors of some of these [funding] requests,” said Jeff Miller, deputy mayor for planning and economic development under Gray. “Doing these projects means a lot of brain damage, and a lot of people aren’t necessarily specialists in it.”

Building private-sector interest requires demonstrating there will be ongoing opportunities to build affordable units if companies commit to it. Polly Donaldson, Bowser’s housing director, is issuing more requests for projects and assessing them more quickly. Previous funding requests went out every year or two; Donaldson is shooting for every six months.

“Knowing that there is certainty in the amount of money that the city is putting into affordable housing production actually motivates all the other stakeholders,” said Claire Zippel of the D.C. Fiscal Policy Institute, an advocacy group. “Look at philanthropy, look at the banks – there are other sources going in the door, and it gives the other sources confidence that the city is there and it’s going to step up on a consistent basis.

Rushing to get money out the door has obvious pitfalls however. Bowser’s plan to build seven new homeless shelters across the city was so beset by unnecessary costs that it was modified before being passed by the D.C. Council.

Fix inclusionary zoning: As of last spring, many onlookers agreed that the District’s inclusionary zoning program — which requires developers of most housing projects to include some affordable units – had been a colossal failure. In six years, it had generated an average of one for-sale unit and eight rental units annually.

When advocates pressed for changes, Bowser’s administration floated multiple proposals, one of which would have required builders to offer units at much more deeply discounted rents than the current law requires.

A number of advocates backed one of the administration’s proposals – only to see it pulled back after criticism from developers who said it would be too expensive.

The advocates won the day, and they are encouraged at how the District overhauled the system for delivering inclusionary zoning units to people on a waiting list.

The DC Department of Housing and Community Development “has gotten better and better at administering inclusionary zoning and deserves a lot of credit for improving the administration of the program,” said Cheryl Cort of the Coalition for Smarter Growth. “A lot of the early problems are gone, and the administration is working very hard to figure out the process. They’ve cut by substantial amounts the time it takes to place an applicant into a unit.”

Hold developers to their commitments: As a member of the D.C. Council, Bowser helped weaken a bill requiring deals for District-owned land to include affordable housing.

However, as mayor she applied the new rules before they went into effect, picking up three development deals she inherited in rapidly gentrifying areas and requiring the developers to include affordable units in their projects. That will create 162 new units.

If the economy tightens, Bowser is likely to face more of these decisions. The District previously rolled back affordability requirements on the Southwest Waterfront project, for instance, as that project’s developers were in search of financing during the last downturn.

So far she has held strong on affordability. When developer Don Peebles came to the administration looking for relief from a requirement that he build 61 affordable units as part of a deal to build high-end hotels and condos on D.C. land in Mount Vernon Square, he received a direct answer: No deal without all 61 units.

Image courtesy of Katherine Frey.

Click here to read the original article.

McMillan isn’t next to Metro, which is less of a problem than you think

Yes, the McMillan Sand Filtration Site is one mile (from either end of the site) to the Red Line. It’s even 0.6 miles to the nearest express bus route (Georgia Avenue’s 79), and key network improvements are still in the planning stages. Yet from the point of view of someone who wants to reduce auto dependence (and the concomitant pollution, injury, and sprawl), what matters most is that MSFS is close to downtown, rather than close to Metro.

Transportation planning research has consistently shown that location relative to downtown and to other land uses is far more closely associated with the amount of driving than location relative to transit. Ewing and Cervero’s definitive 2010 meta-analysis (cited by 679 other scholarly articles) examined over 200 other studies, then combined the correlations found by 62 different studies:

Yes, it turns out that the number of miles that people drive is four-and-a-half times as closely correlated with the distance to downtown than with the distance to a transit stop. This strong relationship between driving and distance to downtown is borne out in local survey research by MWCOG/TPB. Note that whether an area has Metro access (like Largo or White Flint, vs. the Purple Line corridor) doesn’t actually seem to impact the number of drive-alone (SOV) trips.

Some suggest that development proposed for this site should instead go elsewhere. If the development is denied, those residents and employees and shoppers won’t just disappear, they’ll just go somewhere else. They won’t go to superior locations even closer to downtown and Metro (because those are so very plentiful!), but rather to far inferior locations. For instance, the life-sciences employers might choose an alternative location within our region that has already approved a similar mix of uses — such as Viva White Oak, Inova Fairfax, Great Seneca Science Corridor, and University Center in Ashburn, all of which are much further from both downtown and Metro.

This isn’t just the suburbs’ fault. Within the District, even more intensive development than what’s proposed at MSFS has already been given the go-ahead at locations such as the Armed Forces Retirement Home, Hecht Warehouse, and Buzzard Point. All of those sites are also inferior to MSFS from the standpoint of not just transit accessibility and distance to Metro Center, but also on all of the other factors shown to reduce VMT.

If the “Reasonable Development” types truly do care about reducing driving, I must have missed their years of caterwauling over the approval of all these other sites — not to mention the countless suburban developments that together pave over 100 acres of open space every single day in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. That’s why I give more credence to the people who do actually care about paving over the region, like the Piedmont Environmental Council — a/k/a the Coalition for Smarter Growth.

Click here to read the original article

 

Trying to navigate Metro during SafeTrack? Here are some apps that can help.

With SafeTrack in full swing, those sometimes painful Metro commutes may seem even more so.

Single-tracking, station closures and partial line shutdowns have made Metro planning essential. And to do so, many riders have turned to an array of apps. We asked members of  “Off the Rails,” our private Facebook group where Metro riders discuss the system’s impact on their daily lives, which apps they’re using.

Our informal survey gave way to a fruitful discussion. Bear in mind, some people had multiple favorites. And don’t forget that there are always official channels like Metro’s Trip Planner and BusETA to help you map out your commute.

Here’s what they recommended:

MetroHero

This was by far the favorite. In addition to providing the usual dashboard of wait times and a line-by-line breakdown of Metro service disruptions, this app displays Metro’s train locations in real-time, providing a way to visualize congestion in and out of the tunnels.

One Off the Rails member said it’s essential for planning trips on the Silver Line, which he says is “not super regular sometimes.”

“It lets me time when I leave my house so I don’t have to wait, even on normal days,” he said.

Transit App

This app culls all the available transit data in the region and displays it in a clean, simple dashboard. Where’s the nearest bus stop? How far is the Metro? And what if I want to use Capital Bikeshare? It’s all available on one screen in Transit App, which claims to work in 125 metropolitan areas with open transit data.

find a metro

The Coalition for Smarter Growth’s Aimee Custis put it like this: “I’ve used it forever, and…it isn’t broken.”

The app provides wait times and delay information, in addition to map showing landmarks along the way.

Custis: “I chose it originally because it would show me not only Metro trains, but Metrobuses, AND Circulator buses. It also has an offline system map and trip time calculator function, and saves my most commonly-used Metro stations (and others I use) as favorites, which saves me time.”

Metro Now

Off the Rails member Kevin Combes is partial to this app, which he developed himself.

He says it’s a no-frills companion that lets riders instantly access their train times.

Combes: “If you let it access your location, it will auto-select the nearest station when you load the app. Ideally, you open the app and your train times are just there. It also gives you a visual alert if there are official WMATA delays.”

MetroMinder DC

This app, famous for its “heat maps” showing on-time performance and line-by-line delays, is popular with D.C. commuters. It ranks stations in real time on a spectrum from “Great” to “Argh!” As in “The Red Line is SafeTracking this week…’Argh!’”

Moovit

Used by an estimated 45 million people worldwide, Moovit claims to be the no. 1 global app for public transportation. It’s got live walking directions and data for 1,200 cities in 66 countries. And its interface is pretty.

Compatibility: iPhone, Android

D.C. Metro and Bus

The region’s most popular app for local transit, D.C. Metro and bus features train and bus wait times in a simple interface. It’s handy if you need a copy of a Metro map, and also displays Circulator wait times for those needing to navigate the District.

iTrans DC Metro

This app has real-time arrivals, schedule information, directions, push alerts and line diagrams. Off the Rails member Michael Pratt says he uses it for delay-related push alerts.

Compatibility: iPhone

Twitter

Another revelation to come from our unscientific poll: Metro riders have a Twitter habit.

Off the Rails member Tom Spinčić said he relies mostly on Twitter to monitor Metro alerts. Michael Zwirn, another member of the group, agreed.

“True: Twitter alerts tell me about looming issues faster than anything more official!”

Click here to read the original article

 

A Judge’s Ruling Against the Purple Line Uses Metro as a Cudgel, Which Is Ridiculous

Suburban Maryland residents counting on the Purple Line to create a much-needed rail link between Montgomery and Prince George’s counties suffered a loss Wednesday when a federal judge ruled that the project’s planners revise their ridership expectations before proceeding with construction. The crux in Judge Richard Leon‘s order? Metro, its infrastructural woes, and its sagging ridership.

Leon’s ruling came in a case brought by Chevy Chase, Maryland, residents opposed to the Purple Line—which is supposed to run between Bethesda and New Carrollton—and orders the Maryland Transit Administration to undergo another environmental impact statement, potentially delaying the start of construction this fall. A few hours after Leon’s order, the Federal Transit Administration announced it would delay an event, originally scheduled for Monday, at which the Purple Line would have received $900 million in federal funding, nearly half its $2 billion projected construction cost. With Leon’s ruling, the Purple Line is currently ineligible to receive federal funds.

While transit advocates are sensitive to anything that might set back one of their favored projects—especially one that became more politically tenuous after the election of Republican GovernorLarry Hogan—Leon’s rationale in ordering a new environmental review has them especially cheesed.

“I find that defendants’ failure to adequately consider WMATA’s ridership and safety issues was arbitrary and capricious, and that these conditions create the ‘seriously different picture’ that warrant a [secondary environmental impact statement],” Leon wrote in his nine-page order.

The Purple Line’s planners expect that when service begins, 27 percent of its estimated 70,000 daily riders will be transfers from Metro. The current troubles at WMATA—including poor employee performances, diminishing revenue, dated equipment, and a heavy maintenance program lasting through mid-2017—make it convenient for anyone, federal judges included, to speculate Metro won’t be as robust six years from now. But it’s that same speculation that makes Leon’s decision so objectionable, says Stewart Schwartz, the executive director of the Coalition for Smarter Growth, which advocates for public-transit projects.

He’s finding that the current challenges at Metro will be permanent and affect ridership in 2040,” Schwartz says. “I can’t imagine anyone thinking our region can survive without Metro.”

Its the region’s continued growth that makes projects like the Purple Line, which has been discussed since 2001, much more necessary. The entire Washington metropolitan area’s population is expected to pass 7 million by the early 2040s; Montgomery County and Prince George’s counties are projected to have a combined population of more than 2.1 million, about 300,000 more than today.

But what really irks Schwartz is Leon’s mixing environmental case law—which is usually very procedural—with substance that sounds like casual grumbling on a Red Line platform.

“The [National Environmental Policy Act],” the law under which the Purple Line was scrutinized, “has become over time an essentially procedural statute,” Schwartz says. “Judges will throw things back if they’ve failed to comply with procedural requirements. The judge in this case seemed to mix substance and procedure, but it leans very heavily on substance. He even quotes that the arbitrary and capricious standard is narrow, but that’s exactly what he’s doing.”

This is not to say Metro should be given the assumption that it’ll work perfectly a decade from now. Even if its SafeTrack plan achieves the improvements its designed to, WMATA still faces severe structural problems with revenue, labor costs, and long-term financing. But using Metro as a cudgel to set back a separate, albeit symbiotic, commuter line in the guise of additional environmental review, as Leon’s ruling does, reeks of NIMBYism.

That’s not a shock, really. The case was brought by a group of Chevy Chase, Maryland, residents who call themselves the Friends of the Capital Crescent Trail. The Purple Line’s construction will move part of the trail, which runs between Georgetown and Chevy nChase to a less-densely forested area, but will also result in finally completing the trail’s connection to Silver Spring. The Friends, who have made arguments against the Purple Line ranging fromunfounded concerns over local amphipod populations to the train’s route passing by a few schools, want to replace the planned railway with inter-county buses—which would not run through Chevy Chase at all.

These concerns do not really connect to Metro. “It’s quite the leap the judge is making,” Schwartz says. “Nothing has changed about the environmental effects of the project. It’s a wealthy community fighting project that’ll bring significant [development] interest.”

Even nonpartisan observers were struck by Leon’s rationale. “Can’t recall a group of NIMBYs so successfully f-ing over everyone else as these Chevy Chase folks are. My god,” the Washington Post‘sJonathan O’Connell tweeted.

So what’s next for the Purple Line? Maryland Transportation Secretary Pete Rahn is asking the FTA to appeal Leon’s ruling, but with Monday’s $900 million award delayed, the project’s future seems as fragile as ever. Leon has also created a very strange alliance: transit backers who have waited years for the Purple Line are now counting on Hogan and Rahn, who were at best ambivalent on the project’s viability when they took office, to save it. Never doubt the ability of dissatisfaction with Metro to seep into other things.

 

Rendering courtesy Maryland Transit Administration

Click here to read the original article

Judge’s ruling could delay construction of purple line

Metro’s well-documented issues with safety and diminished ridership numbers may have a new victim: the yet-to-be-constructed Purple Line.

U.S. District Court Judge Richard J. Leon ruled yesterday that the Maryland Transit Administration needs to recalculate its ridership projections because its approval was based on forecasts that are no longer accurate. He said he could not “turn a blind eye to the recent extraordinary events involving seemingly endless Metrorail breakdowns and safety issues,” according to The Washington Post.

While the 16.2-mile, $2.4 billion light rail line isn’t a part of the Metro system, it will have connections to the Red, Green, and Orange lines among its 21 stops. Maryland will pay $160 million in construction costs, and is seeking $900 million in federal transit aid along with contributions from local jurisdictions.

“The entire project is at risk because the delay could mean higher construction costs that undo the negotiated public-private financial structure,” said Stewart Schwartz, Executive Director of the Coalition for Smarter Growth, in a statement. ““Yes, Metrorail is facing challenges over the next few years, but the Purple Line is a long-term investment and ridership forecasts are for 2040, by which time the Metro system will have completed major rehabilitation.”

The plaintiffs in the case against building the Purple Line are the Friends of the Capital Crescent Trail. It’s unclear whether this ruling will delay construction, which was slated to begin later this year.

Image courtesy of Maryland Transit Administration

Click here to read the original story

DC Streetcar quietly exceeds low expectations six months in

Nearly six months since its long-awaited debut, the District’s first streetcar line in more than half a century is quietly exceeding early ridership projections while avoiding the kinds of mishaps that have placed the Metrorail system under constant and intense scrutiny. Although not without its own issues to iron out, the 2.2-mile line in Northeast Washington is surpassing the low expectations that resulted from years of ad hoc planning, project delays, cost overruns, and a degree of public apathy.

“So far we’ve been doing quite well. The running times have improved. I think our customers are pleased with the service. The vehicles are being maintained properly. And we haven’t had any safety incidents,” said Leif Dormsjo, the director of the District Department of Transportation, in an interview aboard a well air conditioned streetcar on a hot August afternoon.

D.C.’s top transportation official believes the line’s largely drama-free start is the result of the careful approach he took after inheriting a host of design and construction problems 20 months ago. Dormsjo hit the reset button on the project, bringing in outside experts to evaluate its shortcomings and to establish a better relationship with local safety oversight officials who ultimately had to approve the start of passenger service.

At the end of the month, DDOT is expected to make two decisions that could improve streetcar service: whether 1) to run streetcars more frequently and 2) to operate seven days per week. Sundays are currently set aside for maintenance.

Less than 20 minutes end to end

From the top of the Hopscotch Bridge outside Union Station in the west to the intersection of Benning Road and Oklahoma Avenue Northeast in the east, the average streetcar trip is taking less than 20 minutes — an improvement from the early days of operations, said Dormsjo.

“We’ve seen improvements in the running time since we started in February. We’re about 17 minutes end to end in the early morning hours,” he said.

In fact, the longest trips are during middays instead of rush hour. And more people are riding in the middle of the day and late afternoons than in the morning, although D.C. Streetcar ridership is more evenly spread throughout the day compared to the typical mass transit system that sees big peaks during mornings and afternoons.

DDOT data show the average trip takes about nineteen and a half minutes between 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.; rush hour trips are anywhere from 30 to 90 seconds shorter. The frequency of delivery trucks and lunch hour visitors along the corridor may be slowing streetcars down during middays, Dormsjo said.

That is the assessment of Kenny Cook, the manager of a Lebanese eatery at the corner of H and 5th Streets.

“There are a lot of issues with parking. There are a lot of issues with delivery trucks. If you park one millimeter on that red line,” said Cook, referring to the stripe that delineates where cars can safely parallel park, “it shuts down traffic and you have to get a tow truck, and a tow truck shuts down the other lane because it has to back in and pull the car out.”

Despite some traffic tie ups, Cook rates the streetcar as a positive so far.

“It helps business. It brings people to the business,” said Cook, who added that the streetcar also has dropped off a few unruly passengers whom he had to eject from his restaurant in the late-night hours. He stays open until 3 a.m. on weekends.

Also, westbound trips are consistently longer than eastbound trips by about one minute due to a problem with the traffic signal configuration at the intersection of H and 3rd Streets at the base of the Hopscotch Bridge.

Westbound streetcars often have to wait through an entire signal cycle before they are able to enter the intersection and cross over to the center-running tracks on the bridge.

“We’re working with the operators to make sure that they’ve got the vehicle positioned in the right place so when they call for the intersection signal to change they get into the sequence in the right fashion,” said Dormsjo. “We’re also working with the signal engineers to make sure the communications between the streetcars and the signal itself are working without any irregularities.”

The sleek, red and gray streetcars are attaining average speeds of about eight miles per hour, somewhat faster than Metro’s significantly more crowded X2 bus line, according to DDOT. In the end, streetcars are at the mercy of traffic congestion in the busy commercial corridor of H Street and Benning Road Northeast.

More riders than expected

Nearly 70,000 passengers rode D.C.’s five streetcars in June, according to DDOT figures. The weekday average was 2,773, and close to 3,000 passengers boarded streetcars on Saturdays that month. The average headway — the interval between streetcars — was 14 minutes, one minute better than the scheduled headway.

The June figures are higher across the board compared to May, but not quite as good as April’s mark of 3,399 average trips on Saturdays.

“We initially thought we’d be in the 1,500 range,” Dormsjo said.

To boost ridership over the next six months, DDOT will soon decide whether to shorten headways to 12 minutes. But that change would require having a complete fleet. One of the District’s six streetcars — one of three built by Inekon in the Czech Republic — has yet to see action.

The broken streetcar finally received the parts needed to fix its electrical unit and is undergoing final safety certification, Dormsjo said.

“We’re going to be at full strength very shortly and that is also going to coincide with the decisions that we make about service improvements,” he said.

While pleased with the relatively strong early ridership, DDOT is looking to Kansas City as example of potential growth. The city opened its 2.2-mile streetcar line in May and is already exceeding 6,000 daily riders. The KC Streetcar, which is free to ride, runs every 10-15 minutes and seven days a week.

“We are looking very closely at introducing Sunday service which is something that we have heard a lot from the businesses in the community,” said Dormsjo. “Friday and Saturday are our best days on the H Street line, so we think Sunday could be a real benefit to the businesses and communities along this corridor.”

No fare

One decision DDOT will not be ready to make for at least another six months is whether to charge a fare. D.C. Streetcar has been free since opening day on Feb. 27, and for two reasons it may remain free for good.

First, Dormsjo said charging even a minimal fare could hurt ridership. He pointed to Atlanta, where ridership plummeted 48 percent in the first three months of the year after the city started charging $1.00 to ride the 2.7-mile line.

“We’re definitely looking at what other streetcar services have done in terms of their evaluation of fare policy,” said Dormsjo, who said the streetcar’s annual operating expenditures will come to about $8 million.

Second, the cost of collecting the fare could exceed fare revenues, Dorsmjo said, depending on what system the District chooses to install aboard its fleet.

“The streetcar was never intended to be a money-making enterprise in and of itself. The intent is to support economic activity and investment along the corridor. So when you take a broader look at what the streetcar can do to the city’s bottom line it is a net positive, because it is supporting large scale private investment in places that have been neglected for years,” the DDOT chief said.

Dormsjo said if he could do the streetcar over again (he inherited the troubled project when the Bowser administration took office in January 2015) he would build it twice as long as the current 2.2 miles. DDOT is studying plans to extend the initial H Street/Benning Road line east to Ward 7 and west to Georgetown.

Public transit advocates argue the streetcar will not be worth the city’s initial large investment, now well over $200 million, if it is not expanded to additional neighborhoods.

“We really need more transit for District residents to be able to get across the city as we’ve seen with Metro capacity and any number of other challenges,” said Aimee Custis at the Coalition for Smarter Growth. “The next thing we want to see from the streetcar is to help more people get to more places.”

Her group also is calling for shorter headways.

“Right now we are at a 15-minute headway. We need more vehicles, and when you get to a 10-minute headway, it lets people not have to think about the schedule,” Custis said. “We’re not quite there yet with the streetcar.”

DDOT originally planned to run streetcars every 10 minutes along H Street, but aforementioned mechanical problems with one of the six vehicles led to the 15-minute intervals.

Shariffa Raheem, one of 24 operators hired by a project subcontractor. (Martin Di Caro/WAMU)

Streetcar figures: more than $100 million per mile

The cost of the District’s entire streetcar endeavor, which began when the tracks were laid during a massive streetscape renovation starting in 2008, has climbed to $229 million as of March 8, according to figures requested by WAMU 88.5.

That initial streetscape project on H Street and Benning Road Northeast totaled $15 million. More than $9 million has been spent on at least four corridor studies, and $14 million on operating costs that included months of test runs starting in August 2014 prior to the first six months of passenger service.

But by far the largest expenditures involve the construction of the route and two car barns ($152 million) and project management ($30 million).

Primary contractor Dean Facchina was paid $86 million for the design and construction of the 2.2-mile line ($54 million) as well as two car barn/maintenance yards. The first car barn is temporary and cost $5 million to build. The second, a permanent facility now under construction and due to open next year, has a total cost of $28 million, according to the DDOT documents.

The two projects were split up to mitigate the delay to the start of passenger service caused by the historic landmarking of the Spingarn High School campus, which required a complete redesign of the permanent car barn and maintenance yard with the approval of the Historic Preservation Review Board.

The Kingman Park Civic Association, which filed the application to historically landmark the entire campus, also filed an injunction to stop construction and a lawsuit — all costing the project time and money.

Included in the $229 million price tag is $20 million (to the contractor Fort Myer Construction) for an initial line segment (only 75 percent complete), test track, and temporary maintenance and operation facility in Anacostia — a reminder that the District originally planned to bring back streetcar service to the eastern side of the river first. Those pieces of infrastructure are no longer part of the District’s plans and it is unclear what the city will do with them.

The six streetcars cost $22 million, or about $3.6 million each. Three were built a decade ago by Inekon in the Czech Republic. Three were manufactured by Oregon Iron Works.

D.C. streetcar will cost the District about $8 million to operate, Dormsjo said, with — as of now — no fare revenues coming in to partially offset that cost.

The line has a staff of 53 employees through multiple contractors and subcontractors. Among them are 24 streetcar operators, four service attendants, nine maintenance technicians, three directors of maintenance, operations, and safety, eight supervisors, and a general manager under the firm RDMT, which operates streetcars in two U.S. cities: Washington and Tucson.

RDMT has been paid $10 million to date, according to the DDOT documents.

Image courtesy of Victora Pickering

Click here to read the original story

Zoning Change Could Give District 2,600 More Affordable Housing Units

As cranes continue to dot the skyline, there’s new reason to be optimistic that D.C. will get more desperately needed affordable housing units over the next few years.

That’s because the District’s Zoning Commission voted last week to strengthen the city’s “inclusionary zoning” program, which gives developers more leeway to construct buildings that are denser than what’s typically permitted—in exchange for providing below-market-rate units. If the D.C. Council and Mayor Muriel Bowser approve it, the change would produce upwards of 2,600 affordable units over the next five to 10 years, according to the D.C. Fiscal Policy Institute (DCFPI) and the Coalition for Smarter Growth.

As of now, inclusionary zoning requires new residential buildings to set aside units for households making 80 percent or below the area median income, or $1,600 for a one-bedroom rental. The Zoning Commission approved changing that threshold to 60 percent of AMI, or $1,100 for a one-bedroom rental (equivalent to a three-person family bringing in $59,000 a year). The groups contend that current zoning standards haven’t sufficiently benefitted low- and middle-income residents, many of whom are “severely rent burdened” and spend more than half of their income on housing costs.

“No one tool can completely solve our affordable housing crisis,” saysClaire Zippel, a housing policy analyst at DCFPI. “We’re going to need to keep revisiting our housing programs. That said, I think this [change] will put a big dent in the need [for more affordable housing], especially in terms of increasing economic diversity in high-opportunity neighborhoods with access to transit and jobs.”

Zippel adds that when the District initially adopted inclusionary zoning about 10 years ago, the local housing market wasn’t as hot, and it was the first time policymakers were designing such a program here. She says its administration hasn’t discouraged developers from building in D.C., with residential construction now at its highest level in 25 years. The Department of Housing and Community Development runs a lottery system that matches eligible households with IZ units, Zippel explains, but only 10 to 15 percent of the units created so far through the IZ program have been affordable to households making at or less than 50 percent of AMI.

If finalized, the new changes would not be retroactive, because developments already built or in the pipeline were planned in a different regulatory environment. The D.C. Council last year unanimously passed a “sense of the Council” resolution in support of amending the IZ program. Meanwhile, Mayor Muriel Bowser has made it a priority to maintain affordable housing, in part by investing $100 million in the District’s Housing Production Trust Fund in each of her first two budgets.

“Going forward, preservation [of affordable housing] is going to be the key,” Zippel says, citing a “strike force” Bowser launched to study the issue. “It’s so much harder to reproduce affordable housing that’s been lost than it is to preserve what already exists.”

The commission’s vote follows advocates filing a petition to the body last January. It remains open for public review until 30 days after coming down.

 

Image courtesy of D.C. Office of Planning

Click here to read the original story

DC Zoning Commission allots more affordable units for lower income families

A group of affordable housing advocates scored a victory yesterday in their plight to restructure D.C.’s Inclusionary Zoning Program. Based on a vote by the D.C. Zoning Commission, the program may soon benefit a larger number of economically challenged families.

D.C.’s Inclusionary Zoning Program requires developers to price 8 to 10 percent of their residential units below market rate. Specifically, the program is for new projects with 10 or more units, such as the massive mix-used development coming to H Street NE. It also includes rehab projects that are expanding an existing building by at least half and adding 10 or more units.

Last January, the DC Campaign for Inclusionary Zoning petitioned the D.C. Zoning Commission to make more of the units available for residents who make less than 60 percent of the average income in the region, according to a joint release from the D.C. Fiscal Policy Institute and the Coalition for Smarter Growth. The current area median income for D.C. is $108,600 for a family of four. This means that a family of three with a household income below $59,000 a year would pay $1,100 a month for a one-bedroom rental under the program.

The commission considered the recommendation yesterday, and voted to require developers to designate all of their affordable rental units for people who make under 60 percent of the area median income. This will make more than 2,600 apartments available to low-income families over the next five to 10 years (based on the pace of new developments, which has climbed to a 25-year high), according to the release.

Currently, the majority of inclusionary zoning units, for rent and ownership, are for people who make 80 percent of the area median income. These are people who can afford to pay $1,600 for a one bedroom rental—a cost that’s too expensive for three-fourths of families on the housing program’s waiting list.

“The economics show that this change strikes the right balance between encouraging market-rate housing production and incorporating greater affordability for those left out of the market,” said Cheryl Cort of the Coalition for Smarter Growth, which formed the DC Campaign for Inclusionary Zoning alongside the Metropolitan Washington Council of the AFL-CIO, Jews United for Justice, DC Fiscal Policy Institute, People’s Consulting, Somerset Development, City First Homes, and PolicyLink.

Carlos Jimenez of AFL-CIO thanked the commission for strengthening the affordable housing policy, and “listening to the voices of those who are being priced out” so that “working people can still call D.C. home.”

After a 30-day public review period, the commission’s decision is expected to become final.

Click here to read the original story.

Photo courtesy it used to be me

Got a quick, cheap fix for I-270 traffic? Maryland wants to hear it.

Got a quick fix traffic solution for I-270 in Maryland? Quick means it could be implemented in two to three years and for less than $100 million, a tiny sum compared to the multi-billion dollar price tags of most major regional transportation projects.

Those are the only conditions Maryland transportation officials are placing on proposals they are seeking from the private sector to improve traffic flow on the state’s most congested highway. Yes, I-270 is even worse than the Beltway in Maryland, says transportation secretary Pete Rahn.

“We don’t have the solution to congestion with what we currently have available to us in our tool chest,” said Rahn in an interview at MDOT headquarters in Hanover.

The state is asking the private sector to come up with an idea — any idea that might work.

“This is as open a procurement as you can possibly imagine, telling the world that we are open to new concepts,” said Rahn. “We don’t know what it’s going to look like.”

But Rahn has ruled out one possible solution to rush hour traffic backups: toll lanes, which are expensive and time-consuming projects. One needs to simply glance across the river to Northern Virginia to see 45 miles of HOT (high-occupancy toll) lanes on I-495 and I-95 that offer motorists a choice: pay a toll for a faster ride, or stick with the regular lanes and risk getting slowed down by congestion.

“We have ruled out tolling on 270 because of the length of time that would be necessary to implement it. I would hope that we could have solutions implemented within two, maybe three years,” he said.

Proposals are due in September, but Maryland’s top transportation official said if he does not receive one he is in love with, the state won’t spend the money.

“Industry of the world, bring us your concepts, tell us how it will work and we will pay you upon your performance,” said Rahn, who said he is not aware of any quick-fix highway projects in the world that cost less than $100 million.

And critics of his approach argue it could induce more people to drive, eventually filling up I-270 with long-distance, drive-alone commuters all over again.

“The congestion can return very quickly because people change the time of their commute back into the peak hour. They may drop out of a carpool and travel alone. They might leave transit and then drive alone in the corridor,” said Stewart Schwartz, the executive director of the Coalition for Smarter Growth, a pro-transit group.

Schwartz favors establishing express bus service in dedicated lanes to facilitate faster commuting over long distances, and fears any short-term “improvement” to I-270 will lead to more sprawl.

“It has to start with better land use planning in Frederick County and beyond,” he said. “We need to revitalize and continue to invest in the city of Frederick and in mixed-use, walkable communities in the county, and not spread development all across the countryside where people have to drive for every trip.”

Rahn rejects the “induced demand” argument against highway projects, saying commuters have proven they are willing to drive in terrible traffic to get to work far from home.

“People are in fact willing to drive now an hour and a half, two hours, from where they work,” he said. “People will bear almost intolerable conditions in order to stay in their cars.”

Funds for an I-270 solution are part of a $2 billion transportation package backed by Gov. Larry Hogan. It focuses largely on roads but also includes funding for the Purple Line light rail system in Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties.

Photo courtesy of Raymond Wald: https://flic.kr/p/boY7nS.

Click here to read the original story.