Category: CSG in the News

STATEMENT on WMATA’s closure of Metrorail for equipment investigation

WASHINGTON, DC — In response to the WMATA decision to close Metrorail on Wednesday, March 16 for an emergency equipment investigation, Coalition for Smarter Growth Executive Director released the following statement: “It took years for Metrorail to end up in this situation, where maintenance underfunding left us with the problems we see today. Clearly, we have a ways to go to repair Metro’s aging systems. The new General Manager Paul Wiedefeld has shown he is willing to take the tough and bold steps necessary to focus the staff on making the critical fixes the system needs, and to keep the system safe — in this case on an emergency basis.

How Not to Think about Mass Transit

Michael Paul Williams, a feature columnist for the Richmond Times-Dispatch, takes a dim view of a decision by the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors to discontinue a subsidized bus route between downtown Richmond and Chesterfield Plaza. “Chesterfield, despite its dramatic demographic shifts and an increasing poverty rate, continues to turn a blind eye to residents who don’t own cars due to choice, age, disability or the inability to afford one,” he writes in his column today.

He indicts Chesterfield’s decision without ever revealing (a) how much it costs to maintain the service, (b) how many passengers used the service, or (c) how much the subsidies amount to per passenger, much less asking (d) how such a sum might be spent more beneficially in other ways.

The prospect of such reasoning taking hold in the Richmond region and driving the expenditure of real money should be terrifying in the extreme to anyone who objects to the squandering of tax dollars on symbolic gestures rather than on remedies that actually work. Walk with me through his column and despair.

Williams writes:

The supervisors gutted the budget of the Route 81 Express, creating the ridership decline they used to justify killing it. What exactly did the board expect from a route that offered one round-trip in the morning and a single one-way trip from downtown Richmond to Chesterfield in the afternoon with no stops in between? The board couldn’t have undermined the bus route more effectively if it had let the air out of the tires.

He has a point. Sort of. True, the route structure was idiotic. From Williams’s account, it sounds like the Chesterfield supervisors were trying to provide mass transit on the cheap and the route was doomed to fail. The obvious solution, however, is to pull the plug on the project before wasting any more money — just what the board did. The alternative is to double up on a bad situation, spending money to beef up the schedule or add interconnecting lines in the hope of creating critical mass. But what would such an arrangement look like, how much money would it cost, and how many people would be likely to ride that route? Just how much money does Williams propose throwing at the problem?He doesn’t say. He just wants more.

Williams brushes close to enlightenment when he quotes Jesse W. Smith, Chesterfield’s transportation director: “The county really doesn’t have the density to support traditional bus service.”

Bingo. The rule of thumb is that people are willing to walk 1/4 mile to avail themselves of mass transit. If 500 people live within a 1/4-mile radius of a bus stop, that represents far fewer potential customers than if, say, 2,500 people live within a 1/4-mile radius.  It also matters how walkable the streetscapes are. Are there sidewalks? If so, are they set away from streets with cars whizzing by at 45 miles per hour? When pedestrians cross the street, do they feel like they’re taking their lives into their hands? Is the walk visually interesting or is the view monotonous and undifferentiated?

Chesterfield is the epitome of the autocentric suburb. Given decades of low-density, hop-scotch, pedestrian-unfriendly development, Chesterfield County has a pattern of land use that is totally hostile to walkability and inappropriate for transit. Trying to implant mass transit in such an environment would be like planing a banana tree in Alaska: It can’t possibly thrive.

Chesterfield fully deserves criticism for its horrendous land use decisions, but that is no reason to compound the error by superimposing an unsuitable mass transit system. If Williams would like to spark a useful discussion, he could start by suggesting which transportation corridors might lend themselves to mixed-use development at higher densities that might one day, given sufficient redevelopment, support a bus line at reasonable cost.

“They’re shooting themselves in the foot,” Williams then quotes my old friend Stewart Schwartz, executive director of the Coalition for Smarter Growth, as saying. Williams summarizes Schwartz as making a point similar to one that I have often made on this blog:

In today’s competitive marketplace for corporations and employees, the suburban office park model of the late 20th Century is fading fast as companies seek to appeal to a millennial workforce that increasingly eschews the automobile and would rather walk, bike or ride mass transit to work. From Charlotte to Phoenix to Denver to Cleveland, “elected officials and business leaders recognize that transit provides a competitive edge,” Schwartz said.

That’s all very true. But it’s also totally irrelevant to Chesterfield. The transit systems he mentions serve areas that have far more people within walking distance of their bus stops than Chesterfield can ever think to have. Buses and Bus Rapid Transit might make sense in Richmond’s urban core (assuming City Council enacts appropriate zoning and invests in walkable streetscapes) but none at all in Chesterfield.

Williams then quotes former Sen. John Watkins, a Republican who represented Chesterfield County, who “was a lonely voice in the wilderness on the need for mass transit” (and who also was a prime mover behind the Rt. 288 corridor that opened up vast new swaths of the county to autocentric development). When he joined the legislature in the 1980s, Watkins observed, Fairfax County was adamant about not wanting buses, “and how they’re the biggest user of transit dollars in the state.”

Here’s the flaw with that comparison: Fairfax County had a population density of 2,862 inhabitants per square mile in 2014; Chesterfield had a population density of 742. Fairfax had nearly four times the population density! Moreover, there are sections of Fairfax that have far higher density than the average, while population in Chesterfield is smeared uniformly across the landscape. Buses make far more economic sense in Fairfax than Chesterfield.

Yes, Chesterfield has made a mess of itself. Yes, Chesterfield has created a land use pattern that makes life difficult for poor people lacking access to automobiles. But, no, compounding one folly with another is not an answer. Chesterfield needs to develop corridors of high-density, mixed-use development capable of supporting mass transit before adding new bus routes. Only then will the cost-benefit ratios look remotely favorable.

There are currently no comments highlighted.

Click here to read the original story.

Metro Executes Unprecedented Rail Shutdown For Safety Inspections Wednesday

Updated 7 p.m.

WMATA has closed the entire Metrorail system Wednesday to conduct emergency inspections of more than 600 electrical cable connections, the transit agency said.

The commuter rail system will be closed in D.C., Maryland and Virginia from midnight Tuesday through 5 a.m. Thursday. The Office of Personnel Management said federal agencies will be open Wednesday but employeeshave the option for unscheduled leave or telework.

Metro’s general manager, Paul Wiedefeld, announced the shutdown at a news conference Tuesday afternoon. Officials said it was the first time Metro would close all of its railways for any reason other than a weather emergency.

A fire on the tracks near the McPherson Square station led to major delays throughout the system Monday. The incident was traced to a faulty “jumper cable,” the same kind of electrical component that is believed to have malfunctioned last year and caused a train to fill with smoke near L’Enfant Plaza, killing one passenger and sickening dozens.

National Transportation Safety Board investigatorsidentified the need for the safety fix last year, and last June Metro’s top engineer Rob Troup cautioned that repairs requiring track shutdowns during daytime hourswould be necessary.

Wiedefeld said the threat to life is low in this case, but he was taking no chances with the safety of Metro riders and staff.

The ripple effects

Almost anyone who needs to navigate D.C. on a weekday will be affected by the decision, and there will be far more cars on the road than usual. Authorities were urging commuters to have patience. In a nod to the increased usage of roads, WMATA said parking would be free at all Metro-owned lots and garages Wednesday.

D.C. Public Schools announced they would still be open Wednesday, and were working with Metro to offer additional bus service. Tardies and absences will be excused, the school district said. As of Tuesday evening, a handful of the city’s public charter schools had canceled classes. About 87,000 students attend some form of public school in D.C.

The D.C. city government also will be open.

The VRE rail service announced it will continue to operate normal service Wednesday. The Maryland Transportation Authority said all three MARC rail lines would be operating at full service with “limited extra capacity.” Bus users should be prepared for delays because of heavy traffic, MTA said.

One type of vehicle will definitely not be on the city’s roads: The District will not send out street sweepersWednesday.

Tough decision, strong reactions

U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said in a written statement that the shutdown highlights the need for “a permanent Metro safety office with real teeth.” The secretary has been outspoken in pushing for the transit agency’s jurisdictions to create such an entity. “While this shutdown is inconvenient, they are doing the right thing by putting the safety of their passengers and workers first,” Foxx said.

Rep. Gerry Connolly, a Virginia Democrat whose district includes thousands of federal workers, called Metro’s decision “a gut punch to the hundreds of thousands of commuters who depend on the system.” In an an interview with WAMU 88.5 News, he called it a “sad, sad day.”

An advocacy group said it was hopeful the Metro closure will encourage elected officials to support more public funding for mass transit system maintenance. The Coalition for Smarter Growth, which says its mission is to promote pedestrian- and transit-friendly communities, said in a news release that Wednesday’s unprecedented shutdown is the result of maintenance underfunding through the years.

The group credited Metro leadership for taking the “tough and bold steps” to shut the system down for an inspection.

The shutdown is likely to be a boon for taxi and ridesharing companies. Roy Spooner, general manager of Yellow Cab of D.C., said he’s calling in extra staff to help take phone calls. He sent word to his drivers to get ready for Wednesday.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Photo courtesy of Martin Di Caro. Click here to read the original story.

The Latest: DC Suspends Street Sweeping to Ease in More Cars

The Latest on the decision to shut down the entire DC subway for a full day to allow inspections (all times local):

———

7:15 p.m.:

Metro’s closure Wednesday will have a sliver of a silver lining.

The DC Department of Public Works said Tuesday it will ease off on street sweeping violations during the Metro shutdown with the expectation that more parking spaces will be needed for commuters driving to work. That also means residential street sweeping will be suspended on Wednesday.

The DPW stresses, however, that violations such as an expired parking meter and parking in a crosswalk will be enforced.

Normal parking enforcement and street sweeping will resume on Thursday.

———

6:50 p.m.:

An advocacy group says it’s hopeful Metro’s closure on Wednesday will encourage elected officials to support more public funding for mass transit system maintenance.

The Coalition for Smarter Growth said in a news release Tuesday that the decision to darken Metro for a full day is the result of maintenance underfunding through the years. It credited Metro leadership for taking the “tough and bold steps” to shut the system down for an inspection.

The coalition says its mission is to promote pedestrian- and transit-friendly communities. It urged Washingtonians and commuters to turn to buses, carpools, walking and biking while Metro is out of commission.

———

6:30 p.m.:

With the district’s commuter rail system out of service until Thursday, federal workers are being told they can take an unscheduled leave or telework on Wednesday.

The announcement was made Tuesday by the Office of Personnel Management.

Spokesman Samuel Schumach says those two options are intended to help ease commuting problems related to Metro’s closure.

———

6 p.m.:

Washington’s public schools will remain open Wednesday, despite Metro’s shuttering for an inspection.

In a statement, District of Columbia Public Schools said it is working with Metro to add additional bus service.

Because of the mass-transit shutdown, school division spokeswoman Michelle Lerner said students who are late or absent will be excused because of the difficulty some parents will face getting their children to class.

Lerner said the D.C. schools have 48,589 students. Public charter school students push the district’s total attend to more than 87,000.

The U.S. Office of Personnel Management has not yet made an announcement about whether it will close federal government offices.

———

5:20 p.m.:

Commuters are dreading a day without their Metro.

Justice Department intern Atlee Ahern says the system is used by virtually everyone to get to their jobs. When Metro is shut down, she said the whole city shuts down.

Ahern rides Metro from her home in Bethesda, Maryland. She said she did not see how it would be possible for her to get to the office. She was hoping the federal government would grant unscheduled leave or telework, as two congressmen have suggested.

Metro’s closure is likely to be a boon for taxi and ridesharing companies.

Roy Spooner is general manager of Yellow Cab of D.C. He said he’s calling in extra staff to help take phone calls and sent word to his drivers to get ready for Wednesday.

———

5 p.m.:

The head of the rail system that serves the nation’s capital and its Virginia and Maryland suburbs says the system will shut down for a full day after a fire near one of the system’s tunnels.

Metro head Paul J. Wiedefeld said the system would be shut down all of Wednesday. He made the announcement at a news conference Tuesday afternoon at the agency’s headquarters.

The shutdown comes after a fire broke out Monday about 4:30 a.m. in the tunnel outside the McPherson Square station in downtown Washington. The fire led to delays on the orange, blue and silver lines, which go through the station.

———

4:20 p.m.

An official briefed on the decision says the entire Washington, D.C., subway system will shut down for at least 29 hours to inspect electrical components on the tracks.

The official spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because the official was not authorized to release the information ahead of a planned news conference at 4:30 p.m.

The official says the Metro subway system will shut down at midnight Tuesday and remain closed until at least 5 a.m. Thursday, which is the regularly scheduled opening time.

A fire on the tracks led to major delays throughout the system on Monday. The fire was caused by the same kind of electrical component that malfunctioned last year, causing a train to fill with smoke inside a downtown Washington tunnel.

Click here to read the original story.

With no idea how to get to work, Metro riders bemoan late notice of shutdown

Metro passengers and local lawmakers were trying to shake off their shock and plan alternative commutes for Wednesday morning after authorities announced that the region’s sprawling rail system would close at midnight and remain completely shuttered for 24 hours.

The Office of Personnel Management said that federal government employees could telework to avoid what could be crippling traffic jams in the nation’s capital, but several local school systems, including D.C. Public Schools, announced they would remain open Wednesday, posing a challenge for students and teachers who depend on Metro to get to class.

Metro’s unprecedented closure immediately drew complaints and concern. Riders asked why Metro hadn’t announced the shutdown earlier in the day Tuesday to give passengers more time to plan for a midweek standstill, and some said they are worried about what the episode says about the system’s overall safety.

Many in the Washington region were left with a simple quandary: How would they get to where they need to go on Wednesday without Metro, the linchpin in a public transit system that connects the District and its traffic-choked Maryland and Virginia suburbs?

“It’s going to affect our workday for sure,” said Henrik Sundqvist, who lives with his wife in Arlington, Va. Because the two have one car between them and work in opposite ends of the region — he in Dunn Loring in Fairfax County and she in Anacostia in the District — he said he has no idea how they would get to work.

The closure, which will allow Metro to inspect the lines amid concerns about the system’s electrical cables, might disrupt hundreds of thousands of lives Wednesday, but officials said it was in the interest of not putting anyone at risk on the rails.

Former U.S. transportation secretary Ray LaHood praised Metro’s leadership, including General Manager Paul J. Wiedefeld, for putting safety first.

“When you discover a potential threat to safety, you must do everything in your power to act,” LaHood said. “While the shutdown is obviously disruptive to the daily commutes of many Washingtonians, it is far better to be inconvenienced than to risk another life-threatening incident.”

Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) also said he supported Wiedefeld’s decision to “take whatever steps are necessary to keep Virginians safe.”

But he and many other local, state and federal lawmakers said that the shutdown should serve as a wake-up call that Metro is a troubled agency in need of serious reforms.

“It is deeply disturbing that the system is in such a precarious state that it must be entirely and abruptly shut down during the middle of a workweek,” Rep. John Delaney (D-Md.) said in a statement. “This is a stark demonstration of a total agency failure.”

In a statement, Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) called the closure “an astonishing admission that safety has not been the priority it needs to be at WMATA,” the Washington Area Metropolitan Transit Authority.

Rep. Gerry E. Connolly (D-Va.) said the announcement, which he learned of from a note passed to him on the House floor, was a “gut punch” that raises many questions.

“Was there no alternative? Is this, moving forward, how we’re going to deal with major repairs when something happens?” Connolly said. “Safety has to come first, but this must be an extreme situation to justify shutting down the entire system. And when you shut down Metro, as my colleagues here are going to learn tomorrow, you essentially shut down the federal government.”

Lawmakers from outside the Washington region took notice, as well. Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.), a noted transit advocate, said he was “deeply concerned” by the shutdown of a system that serves members of Congress, their staff members and the federal government at large.

“It’s a very serious signal,” Blumenauer said. “We’ve known that there have been problems for a whole host of reasons. . . . But I am hopeful that everybody in Congress pays attention to that, because we all live here a third of the time. This transit system is the transit system for our employees, for the federal workforce, and it’s in desperate need of everybody’s attention.”

Were his hometown of Portland to shut down its light-rail system on a weekday, he said, “it would have extraordinarily serious consequences.”

Jim Dinegar, president of the Greater Washington Board of Trade, said he is concerned that the shutdown will have a chilling effect on tourism in the short and the long term. Metro’s inspections on Wednesday could turn up new problems that further shake public confidence in the troubled rail system, he said. “They won’t find good things,” he said. “They’ll find risks.”

Many Metro advocates and passengers said the shutdown is a sign of the need for greater public investment in the system.

“We will see on Wednesday just how important Metro is to our region,” said Stewart Schwartz, executive director of the Coalition for Smarter Growth. “We hope that the ongoing chal­lenges facing Metro will prompt our elected leaders to work together to provide the funding necessary to fix long-standing maintenance and rehabilitation problems.”

During Tuesday’s evening commute, passengers were just beginning to grapple with how important Metro is to them on a daily basis — and in particular how important it would have been to them Wednesday.

Janice Williams, a house cleaner from Hyattsville, Md., said she will have to take three buses to get to work Wednesday. She was frustrated but said she is glad officials erred on the side of safety.

“It sucks that it has to happen, but you don’t want to worry about people getting hurt,” Williams said, sitting on a concrete bench in the Metro Center station. “There could be worse things.”

Michael Laurion, 26, who is in town from Dallas for an accounting conference in Arlington, said he had planned to take the Orange Line on Wednesday morning from his downtown hotel.

Now the only thing he knows for certain is that he will be late.

He said he still loves the District and is even thinking of moving here. But the fire that paralyzed three Metro lines on Monday and now the 24-hour shutdown have given him pause about the city’s public transit.

“It makes me wonder how safe, I guess, it really is,” Laurion said.

Others received the news with resignation, having been disappointed by Metro many times before.

Heather Bodenhamer, 24, said she has experienced her fair share of delays and poor service and smoke on the tracks during the past five years. She used to travel from Rockville, Md., to Clarendon in Arlington for work, and because of frequent Metro troubles, she had to leave her home two or three hours early to ensure she would arrive at work on time.

“There were so many times I was late to work,” she said. “It’s sad how unreliable it can be. You never know what’s going to happen.”

Heidi Schriefer said she considers herself one of the lucky ones. She has several options for commuting to work and won’t be terribly thrown off the by the shutdown. Instead, she plans to take a bus from her home in Old Town Alexandria to her office in downtown Washington.

“A lot of other people won’t be able to make it in,” she said. “It’s just irritating that they announced it last minute, on a weekday, and it will affect the whole system.”

That, she said, is the Metro trifecta.

Click here to read the original story.

Williams: On GRTC, Chesterfield must truly buy in

When Chesterfield County pulled the plug on a GRTC Transit System route last week, it again demonstrated its utter unwillingness to buy into a service it bought decades ago.

In 1989 — a century after Richmond established the first viable electric streetcar system in the world — the Chesterfield Board of Supervisors agreed to purchase $50,000 in stock to join Richmond as equal partners in what was then the Greater Richmond Transit Co.

“It seems to me that the county bought into co-ownership of the bus company for one of three reasons: (1) make an investment, (2) be a good neighbor, or (3) use their power as half owner to control the routes,” said John Moeser, senior fellow at the Bonner Center for Civic Engagement at the University of Richmond and an emeritus professor of urban studies at Virginia Commonwealth University. “It’s just a guess, but based on what I know about city-county relationships, public transit, and self-interest, I choose No. 3.”

Last Wednesday, the Chesterfield Board of Supervisors unanimously voted to discontinue by July the Route 81 Express from Chesterfield Plaza to downtown Richmond. That will leave it with one subsidized line connecting the county to the city — Route 82 Express, which runs from the Commonwealth 20 movie theater to downtown Richmond.

“One day, I hope we can have regional transportation, but it is not sustainable right now,” Supervisor James M. “Jim” Holland said.

The puddles in the boardroom were from crocodile tears.

The supervisors gutted the budget of the Route 81 Express, creating the ridership decline they used to justify killing it. What, exactly, did the board expect from a route that offered one round-trip in the morning and a single one-way trip from downtown Richmond to Chesterfield in the afternoon, with no stops in-between? The board couldn’t have undermined the bus route more effectively if it had let the air out of the tires.

As Richmond and Henrico County embark on a bus rapid transit system that is ultimately envisioned to reach Short Pump, it’s unimaginable that GRTC Pulse — with its dedicated lanes and light-rail style stations — will find its way to Midlothian Turnpike or Hull Street Road.

Chesterfield’s steadfast reluctance to use the transit system it co-owns is like a restaurant partner refusing to patronize the establishment because he or she doesn’t like the service or the price of the entrees.

“We’re part owner, but from a service standpoint it’s no different than anyone else,” said Jesse W. Smith, transportation director for Chesterfield. “If Henrico has a line, they have to pay for it. If we have a line, we have to pay for it.”

Well, why not buy more lines?

“The county really doesn’t have the density to support traditional bus service,” Smith said.

I’m not alone in seeing the county’s approach on mass transit as the myopic byproduct of a bygone era.

“They’re shooting themselves in the foot,” said Stewart Schwartz, executive director of the Coalition for Smarter Growth. He observed that in today’s competitive marketplace for corporations and employees, the suburban office park model of the late 20th Century is fading fast as companies seek to appeal to a millennial workforce that increasingly eschews the automobile and would rather walk, bike or ride mass transit to work.

From Charlotte to Phoenix to Denver to Cleveland, “elected officials and business leaders recognize that transit provides a competitive edge,” Schwartz said. And while white-collar commuters increasingly covet alternatives to the automobile, “on the lower-income side, access to jobs and affordable transportation has been studied and found to be a primary tool in enabling people to escape poverty.”

Smith notes that the county is starting to see higher-density areas such as Stonebridge, a mixed-use community at the site of the old Cloverleaf Mall, and Meadowville Technology Park, site of the Amazon Fulfillment Center. It is also studying the Jefferson Davis Highway area of North Chesterfield.

“Transit is certainly difficult to make work in what really is a suburban locality. … We’re going to take a hard look at what makes sense here,” Smith said. “Then the question is, ‘How do you fund it?’”

Mass transit lines can be had at a fraction of the millions of dollars it costs to widen roads and build interchanges. But Chesterfield’s leadership has been loath to see mass transit for what it is — a public service requiring public infrastructure and, of course, public subsidy.

For decades, then-state Sen. John Watkins, a Republican who represented Chesterfield, was an often lonely voice in the wilderness on the need for mass transit.

“I did everything I could during my tenure in the legislature to try to keep things going, to no avail,” said Watkins, who retired last year.

He noted that when he joined the legislature in the 1980s, Fairfax County was adamant about not wanting buses, “and now they’re the biggest user of transit dollars in the state.”

“I think time is going to take us there. But it just wasn’t ready when some of us who were looking forward thought we should be getting ready. But you look at the millennials, they want transit. And I just hope that at some point we come to a point in time when we can say that is a more efficient way to do it. And we just don’t seem to be there yet.”

Watkins notes that Petersburg desperately needs a better connection to Richmond. He’s happy to see the advent of local bus rapid transit. “But until it starts crossing those lines into Henrico and into Chesterfield, it’s going to be limited.”

Pulling the plug on this bus route sends the wrong signal as the city and its surrounding counties work on a Richmond Regional Transit Vision Plan. Chesterfield, despite its dramatic demographic shifts and an increasing poverty rate, continues to turn a blind eye to residents who don’t own cars due to choice, age, disability or the inability to afford one.

Unfortunately, regional mass transit doesn’t work without meaningful cooperation from Chesterfield, the region’s most populous locale.

Until the county gets on board, Greater Richmond’s mass transit will be less than the sum of its parts.

Photo courtesy of Daniel Sangjib. Click here to read the original story.

New Metro Boss Promises Focus On ‘Nuts And Bolts’ To Win Back Commuters

Metro’s new general manager outlined a broad agenda in his first major remarks since taking the job in November, promising to improve rail service for customers and create transparency across the troubled transit authority.

Speaking at a luncheon televised live on CSPAN-2 from the National Press Club, Paul Wiedefeld said Metro’s problems are worse than the public has been led to believe, but his focus will be on short-term fixes to convince riders that their time and safety on the rail lines are paramount.

Metro is “not coming out with a five-year plan. We have those things in place. It’s really about the nuts and bolts of where we can start to make changes that can impact the customer,” Wiedefeld said.

On Sunday the new boss of the second-busiest subway system in America, whose bus and paratransit arms combine with rail to employ 13,000 people, posted an open letter to riders outlining a 28-point plan to fix rail operations and Metro’s shaky finances. Now, the challenge is convincing labor unions, politicians, and riders to go along with it.

“We’ve called for a team effort. The general manager is doing his part. Obviously the management that work for him and the line staff have to do their part, and the unions, the business community and most importantly, the elected officials,” said Stewart Schwartz of the Coalition for Smarter Growth, a transit advocacy group.

Jim Dinegar, the president of the Greater Washington Board of Trade, a business group, also applauded Wiedefeld’s comprehensive approach.

“Metro is the economic engine that drives this region and without it we are crippled,” Dinegar said. “It is not lost of me that [ridership] has really slid. That is a very big concern. We are not just losing them to Uber. We are not just losing them to bikes. People have had shaken confidence in Metro. We have to restore that confidence.”

Much of Wiedefeld’s remarks touched on the system-wide problems detailed in a consultancy’s report obtained by WAMU 88.5 last month. The consulting firm, McKinsey & Company, is expected to provide a series of recommendations in the coming weeks, but Wiedefeld already is implementing changes to his upper management team with promises to overhaul an ineffective management structure at WMATA.

Among the new general manager’s near-term challenges is reigning in unsustainable expenses, which mostly are driven by growing labor costs. The contracts for three unions, including ATU Local 689 which represents about 8,000 workers, expire in June. Negotiations are expected to ramp up soon.

Photo courtesy of Martin Di Caro. Click here to read the original story.

Paul Has A Plan: Metro’s New General Manager Is Ready To ‘Restore Pride’ In WMATA

“My first question. You’ve been in office for about three months now and clearly there are a barrage of issues facing the nation’s second busiest transportation system. How are you going to tackle and actually solve the problems facing Metro,” Thomas Burr, the Washington correspondent for The Salt Lake Tribune and president of the National Press Club, asked Paul Wiedefeld this afternoon.

“That’s all?” Metro’s new general manager responded with a laugh.

Speaking today in conversation at a Press Club luncheon—as well as in an open letter and aWashington Post op-ed—the newly instated GM has laid out his assessment of the beleaguered system and what steps are needed to turn it around.

“What’s equally clear 90 days in, is that turning Metro around requires us to confront some hard truths,” Wiedefeld wrote in his plan to “restore pride” to the region’s transit system.

After spending his first few weeks in office reaching out to stakeholders and becoming familiar with Metro’s systems and problems, Wiedefeld said his focus areas are on improving safety and security, making the system more reliable, and getting WMATA’s fiscal house in order.

“My approach is starting really nuts and bolts, and not so much maybe the larger things,” Wiedefeld told Burr.

Among his plans:

    • Create online reports to monitor all actions taken to meet Federal Transit Administration safety recommendations
    • Restructure the executive unit
    • Introduce platform attendants at key transfer stations
    • Establish management “ownership” by rail line to improve customer experience
    • Launch traffic signal prioritization to improve performance for buses along seven busy corridors
    • Cut back-office costs and redundant positions
    • Conduct cost-benefit analysis regarding sale of Metro headquarters building.
    • Begin installing new Metro and public safety radio systems, including cabling for cell phone service in tunnels.
  • Improve customer complaint resolution through social media.

To keep track of all those promises, and others, Wiedefeld has created a Customer Accountability Report (CARe). Riders can follow WMATA’ progress (or lack thereof) online.

“Actions will be taken in every department as part of Metro’s business plan to make these initiatives successful and to ensure accountability. Some initiatives will be experimental and will only be pursued if they prove successful. Others will be fine-tuned as we learn,” Wiedefeld wrote. “Plans and progress will be communicated frequently throughout Metro, and every employee will be held accountable through specific and measurable goals.

The plan, and the new general manager’s candor in addressing the magnitude of Metro’s problems, has already won praise.

“We applaud the General Manager’s comprehensive and detailed plan for fixing WMATA,” the Coalition for Smarter Growth’s executive director, Stewart Schwartz, said in a statement. It “[offers] confidence that GM Wiedefeld is a leader focused on implementing the reforms we need to restore the system and the public’s confidence.”

Click here to read the original story.

Here’s what Metro should do to win riders back

You don’t have to be a Metro rider to know that the region’s  subway system is in trouble. In fact, that’s why many of you have stopped riding.

A quarterly report — prepared by staff for Metro board’s finance committee meeting on Thursday — says ridership in the second half of 2015 remained at levels not seen in more than a decade.

So we decided now might not be a bad time to ask a bunch of smart people what Metro should do to restore confidence in the system and reverse a ridership decline that looks pretty bad.

How bad? The report is “unrelentingly dismal,” as our colleague Dr. Gridlock put it. Ridership fell 6 percent on weekdays in the second half  of 2015, compared with the same period 2014. Weekend ridership fell 12 percent.

The drop affected virtually every station, every time period, and every type of trip. The usual culprits — bad weather, say — couldn’t be blamed for the pervasiveness of the decline, either. More likely explanations were service problems, such as increasingly erratic train schedules, the report says. Riders, meanwhile, have pointed the finger at other issues, such as safety or security.

In  any event,  ridership hasn’t  been this low since 2004.

So Tripping asked a leader of the new Metro riders union, a smart-growther, a community activist and a few others what they would suggest. Here, with some editing, are the Top 10 things (or five or six, or seven things, depending) that Metro should focus on to halt its skid:

Graham Jenkins lives in D.C. and is an everyday Metro rider. He boards the Silver or Yellow lines, depending on his work situation. Graham, who hopes someday to ride in a 7000-series car, also happens to be vice chair and communications director of the WMATA Riders Union. Here’s what he has to say:

  • Run trains more often during off-peak periods. Period.Running trains more frequently would win riders who currently don’t see Metro as a viable option. It would also help space out weekday commuters, alleviating the pressure on normal rush hour service.
  • Cut all fares by 10%. Riders are no longer receiving the service they’ve paid for. For many, the prospect of interminable delays and offloads now outweighs any savings provided by riding. Reducing fares would certainly cut into revenues, but this would to some extent be made up by increasing ridership. And that unto itself would go a long ways towards reversing the “death spiral.”
  • Develop a pass system that makes sense. Right now, every trip – save for those few who purchase the wildly expensive, 28-day-only “monthly” pass for $237 – is on a pay-per-ride basis. This makes every ride, essentially, a discretionary one. By offering an unlimited monthly pass for a reasonable price (and an entire month), WMATA could encourage trips beyond just those of the commute. And it would also ensure itself a steady source of revenue rather than losing money every time it snows, for instance.
  • Make police more visible. While the overall odds of being attacked or harassed remain low, there are mounting fears that Metrorail is becoming more dangerous to one’s personal safety. By stationing more visible Metro Transit Police officers on trains and at “hotspot” stations, riders would gain some reassurance that their safety is being looked after.
  • Run more buses. Much like rail service, bus service outside of peak hours is woefully infrequent. For many, trips would be better served by bus than rail, especially those within D.C. or a given jurisdiction; yet, the infrequent and delayed buses do not seem like a suitable alternative. Running more off-peak buses would provide people with better alternatives to rail service, particularly in the event of delays. Running supplemental buses on routes that coincide with rail lines undergoing track work would also be of great use.
  • Run only 8-car trains on weekends. With fewer trains in service less frequently, there’s no excuse for not maximizing the capacity there is. Waiting 20 minutes for a train, only to see a six-car train pull in that’s standing room only, is one of the most infuriating aspects to off-peak Metro. And, obviously, the rail cars are available.
  •  Be transparent. This covers a lot of ground. But, more specifically, announce a timeline for the remainder of track work and give an explanation for its distribution (as opposed to focusing on single segments until everything is done). What’s left to be done? Where? Why not do it all in one section at once? We still don’t have answers to these questions, and without a light at the end of the tunnel, it’s hard to hold out much hope that track work and reconstruction will end. Ever.

 

Paula Bienenfeld is an archaeologist, a consultant and president of the Montgomery County Civic Federation. Paula  lives within walking distance of North Bethesda’s White Flint Metro station on the Red Line and rides regularly.  She says she and her husband made a deliberate decision to purchase her current and previous homes to be within walking distance of Metro.

“This system used to be one of the best in the world — but now, not so much,” Paula says.

Here’s her list:

  • Make safety top priority. Implement effective, regular safety training for employees, and make sure they have it and make sure the training is repeated at least bi-annually.  Follow up.
  • Improve communication with riders. When trains are halted or delayed, have the conductor explain immediately what the situation is and why the train is stopped. Right now I go to @unsuckdcmetro [on Twitter] to find out what’s going on. Also, get rid of communication “dead zones”  (see point No. 1).
  • Listen to the feds. Metro must address issues that outside auditors and the federal government are saying need to get done.
  • See that your employees work as a team, and take ownership. The other year when it was snowing, there were bags of snowmelt on the platform, and people were slipping as they came off the train. It was a dangerous situation.  I went upstairs to ask if they would open the bags and sprinkle the snowmelt on the platform.  The answer was, ‘We are operations. You have to get maintenance to do that.’  So, the bags just sat there.
  • Make Metro a clean, well-lighted place. Improve the lighting in the stations. Keep the stations–and the cars–clean.
  • Fix the signage on the trains.  In cases where two lines run on the same track, the commuter, and the tourist, needs to know which train is arriving.  Many times the electronic signage on the outside of the car doesn’t work, and it’s not possible to identify the train.
  • Use recorded messages to announce every stop.  This is done in the Chicago “L” system, which began in 1888, and works very well.  In Washington, we still have announcements that are interrupted and full of static, and no one can understand them. How is it that a system that is well over 100 years old has a better message system than our Metro?
  • Put more maps in the trains.  Right now, there is mostly advertising where there needs to be Metro system maps.  If there is no room, place smaller maps on the dividers at the doors so that people, especially tourists, can figure out where the stops are, and where they are.
  • Fix your clocks so off-peak fares are really off peak. Don’t charge rush hour prices when rush hour service is not being delivered.

 

As a former Navy aviator, Stewart Schwartz flew around tracking Russian submarines. Now he keeps an eye on urban sprawl. He is executive director of the Coalition for Smarter Growth, a 19-year-old nonprofit that focuses on land use and transportation. Metro is a big priority for the group, and Stewart says he tapped his staff to come up with these ideas:

  • Make real-time train arrival information more accurate and available. Arrival times should be available at station entrances to allow riders to decide their best transportation option before descending into the station. Metro should also make sure arrival time information is accurate and synchronous — across stations, across PIDs (the screens), and apps. It should also change how real-time arrival information is displayed on screens:  instead of filling the whole screen with delays and announcements, scroll some information across the bottom of the screen so that arrival times are always visible.
  • Let people know when arrival time isn’t accurate. Riders should be able to know when real time arrival information isn’t accurate, especially because of single-tracking and delays. Correct the information by making announcements.
  • Do better with Twitter. Metro should ensure that someone is staffing WMATA’s social media accounts 24/7, or at least during all hours when bus or rail service is running.
  • Consider shutting down whole sections for repairs instead of  single-tracking. If single-tracking isn’t allowing fast enough progress on system repairs, consider closing portions of the rail system for longer periods to complete all backlogged maintenance in that closed section. Get it done, and then reopen with full service.
  • Communicate better with us. Metro should do more to tell riders about the purpose, duration, and benefits of all track work by using announcements, signage, the WMATA website, social media, and regional media. While travel delays will still be frustrating, they will be infinitely more tolerable when riders have this information — thereby building more trust and understanding, and winning WMATA the support it needs to address other issues.
  • Communicate better among  yourselves. Metro needs to improve its internal communications, promote more information-sharing within the agency, and instill a stronger safety culture. Every employee is a safety officer, and safety must be in the forefront of everyone’s thinking.
  • Work more closely with local governments on building transit-friendly neighborhoods. Metro needs to improve the joint development process with local governments, accelerating the redevelopment of WMATA property and surrounding land into walkable, transit-oriented neighborhoods. Building out transit-oriented development will generate more riders, fare-box revenue, and property taxes, and it will help reduce regional traffic congestion.
  • Find the money. The restoration of Metro cannot happen without adequate and consistent funding. Start an open and inclusive dialogue with the public and elected officials about funding challenges and solutions.
The Washington Post’s transportation reporter Dana Hedgpeth gives us the backstory to the much-maligned mass transit system. The bad news? The long waits in the tunnel aren’t going away anytime soon. The good news? Metro is faster than you thought. (Brad Horn/The Washington Post)

Randal O’Toole is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute who writes about urban growth, public land, and transportation issues. He lives in Camp Sherman, Ore. (pop. 233) but visits Washington often. He has ridden Metro, studied it and written about the region’s mass transit here, here, and here. He is the author of Gridlock: Why We’re Stuck in Traffic and What to Do About It. He is also wearing some very cool-retro Western neckwear in his bio blurbfor Cato. Here’s what Randal has to say: 

  • Stop building rail lines the region can’t afford to maintain. The Silver Line is a disaster, hurting ridership on the Blue Line without adding large numbers of riders itself. Rather than learn that lesson, Metro endorsed the Purple Line, which will only draw more resources away from Metro Rail’s critical maintenance needs.
  • Replace obsolete rail lines with buses. As Metro rail lines wear out, replace these with modern, efficient buses. Buses on a high-occupancy freeway lane can move more people than a Washington subway line, and adding a new bus line doesn’t reduce the capacity of other lines the way the Silver Line reduced the capacity of the Blue Line. Most important, bus capital and maintenance costs are much more affordable than rail, and buses can be just as, if not more, attractive to riders as rail with on-board WiFi and a higher percentage of people comfortably seated rather than standing.
  • Let the computers do the driving. On rail lines that aren’t immediately replaced with buses, Metro should put a higher priority on restoring the signaling and computer systems that once controlled train speeds. The lurching, stuttering human-driven trains since the 2009 fatal collision are uncomfortable to riders and offer little assurance that trains are safer than when they were run by computers.
  • Privatize. WMATA should contract out both rail and bus operations to private companies such as First Transit, Coach, Virgin, or Veolia. Experience in other cities has shown that private operators can save agencies a considerable amount of money, freeing up funds for rail maintenance and bus improvements.
  • Get a sponsor. WMATA should seek corporate or other sponsors of individual rail stations. In exchange for maintaining elevators and escalators, keeping stations clean and attractively decorated, and perhaps even paying for station staff, sponsors would have naming and advertising rights at the stations.
  • Forget dedicated bus lanes.  As Metro develops bus-rapid transit routes, it should avoid the mistake of insisting on expensive and underutilized dedicated bus lanes. Except possibly where numerous bus routes merge in downtown Washington, such dedicated lanes are completely unnecessary. Transit riders are more sensitive to fares and frequencies than speeds, so the best way to boost ridership at a low cost to taxpayers is to offer reasonably priced bus service on major routes at least every five minutes during rush hour and every 10 minutes during other times of the day.
  • Work to convert HOV lanes to bus lanes. In order to have a broad network of bus-rapid transit lines, WMATA should support the construction or conversion of high-occupancy lanes (either free or tolled) along every major highway into and around D.C. Such lanes are a low-cost way of both relieving congestion and providing congestion-free bus routes throughout the region.
  • Make buses more rider-friendly: try “branding” them. One reason some people say rails are better than buses, despite their higher cost, is that rail lines are more “legible,” meaning it is easier to figure out which line to take to a particular destination. That’s only true because there are fewer rail lines than bus lines. But one solution is to paint buses on different routes different colors. This makes it impossible to substitute buses from different routes for one another, but as former FTA Administrator Peter Rogoff notes, paint and buses are cheaper than trains.
  • Follow London’s example: up top, people. Consider double-decker buses for high-use routes. Unlike articulated buses, which are long and clumsy, double-decker buses occupy no more road space than a standard, 40-seat bus, yet can carry twice as many people.
  • Put your financial house in order. WMATA has more than $2.5 billion in unfunded pension and health-care obligations. How will it fund those obligations if it doesn’t have enough transit riders to justify continued subsidies? [And O’Toole warns that shared, self-driving cars are going to do to mass transit what Uber and Lyft have been doing to taxis.] If WMATA doesn’t start to solve that problem now, it will likely end up defaulting on those pension and health care funds.

 

Stephen C. Fehr is an officer at a nonprofit in Washington, and a Metro rider for 33 years. He also happens to be a former Post reporter who covered the transit agency from 1991 to 1996. Here are Steve’s thoughts:

  • Keep to promised headways. What damages Metro’s credibility the most is the failure on many days to deliver rush hour service at the promised intervals between trains. If Metro can’t stick to its advertised schedule, change it to be more realistic.
  •  Improve the public address system in stations and trains. One of my fears living in Washington in an era of terrorism and deteriorating subway safety is of being a Metro passenger during an emergency and failing to hear instructions in stations and trains. It boggles my mind that Metro has failed to keep up with sound technology or that federal homeland security officials apparently have not ordered fixes. No train should leave a rail yard without a working, clear-to-understand PA system, and Metro should do a sound retrofit of its stations.
  •  Make fare increases more predictable. [W]e never know when or how much Metro is going to hit us with a fare increase. Consider instituting a multi-year fare plan in which you raise the base fare, say 5 or 10 cents, on July 1, 2017 and every two years thereafter. The predictability benefits riders and Metro.
  • Stop scolding riders for stuck doors. Metro riders did not design the rail cars with the super-sensitive doors. We know most other transit systems do not have this problem. It is reasonable for an operator to firmly ask passengers not to lean on the doors but it is out of line to berate them for halting the train because of a flawed design.
  • Enforce the no eating/no drinking rule. We’ve come to expect riding dirtier rail cars than in the past. Contributing to this is the lax enforcement of no eating or drinking rules. Riders know they can get away with it.
  • Take care of the little things. On many weeknights, here’s how Metro says goodnight to Silver Line riders exiting at Wiehle Avenue: Train pulls into station and stops. Riders get up and walk toward the doors. Operator then “adjusts” or pulls the train forward a few feet on the platform in a jerky, start-and-stop manner. Startled riders lurch forward, grumbling as they leave the train. Many operators do give warning, but not always.

Kathy A. Gambrell lives in Bethesda. As a “content strategist” in a local business, she uses Metro three or four times a week to meet with clients in downtown Washington, D.C.  Here are some of the ideas she emailed after reading Tripping’s original post:

  • Open your ears to the community, riders, the feds, everyone.Stop being tone-deaf.
  • Jump on the shuttle buses so people can too. Mobilize the shuttle buses — lots of them — as soon as a Metro station shuts down for a problem, such as a loss of power. Then tell riders exactly where they are….not where they are “supposed to be.”
  • Cut fares–especially monthly passes. When it costs anyone anywhere more to ride Metro than to drive everyday, then the fares are too high.
  • Set a uniform policy on young riders for all jurisdictions. Montgomery County has a Kids Ride Free Program that allows free rides on buses and certain routes for children under the age of 18 (or older if the person is still attending high school). The young person has to register for a Youth Cruiser SmarTrip Card. In the District, young people can get a DC One Student Card. In Prince George’s County, students can present proper ID to take advantage of TheBus after school dismissal on regularly scheduled school days. There should be a universal policy for kids who use the local transit systems and Metro.
  • Improve customer relations. Have a system to file a complaint about bad customer service that gets results. Give riders who have had a bad experience a reason to return as a customer.
  • Discipline bus drivers who are verbally abusive. You have cameras, and they should watch more than the passengers.
  • Ditch the posters threatening to throw people in jail for not paying bus fare. It makes Metro look petty and inflexible. Give drivers flexibility to offer free rides when it is appropriate.
  • Practice what you preach. Require Metro’s board members to ride the bus on the coldest days of the year or in rough neighborhoods.

Elizabeth Young, who has worked for the federal government for 20 years, lives in Friendship Heights and rides Metro’s Red and Yellow lines to her job in Crystal City. Her top three priorities:

  • Improve safety. Do what the feds and auditors tell you to do.
  • Increase the numbers and visibility of security personnel.
  • Arrive on time.

“Would I get on an airplane or AMTRAK train that had Metro’s problems?” she writes. “No way. I don’t understand why we allow these ticking time bombs to continue.”

****

We’re happy to hear your nominations, too. If you have a Top 10 list of what Metro should focus on, please send them to Tripping c/o fredrick.kunkle@washpost.com.

Click here to read the original story.

The I-66 deal is more like an armistice than a peace treaty for commuters

The I-66 deal is more like an armistice than a peace treaty for commuters

It’s a big deal, but not a done deal. For commuters, the compromise between Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) and the General Assembly on the future of one of America’s most controversial highways will be meaningful only when things start to happen on I-66.

Feuding over I-66 was inevitable. People have been battling for decades over whether it should exist, who should use it and how big it should be. And it isn’t going to stop just because some people in Richmond shake hands.

Robert Thomson is The Washington Post’s “Dr. Gridlock.” He answers travelers’ questions, listens to their complaints and shares their pain on the roads, trains and buses in the Washington region.

Once the governor made his announcement Wednesday morning, interested parties inundated us with their takes on the deal. Proponents and opponents of tolling and widening were unavoidable for comment.

It was only natural. All those years of feuding have made I-66 more than just a way for people to get to and from work. I-66 is a symbol of opposing visions about how people should travel and where they should live.

Nothing about the deal changed the underlying hopes and resentments. We’ll see that during the Virginia Department of Transportation hearings in March on the design of the high-occupancy toll lanes for I-66 inside the Capital Beltway. Nothing about the schedule for creating the HOT lanes in mid-2017 changed as a result of the Richmond deal.

What did change was that the governor agreed to widen the highway at the same time, and without preconditions, but the widening plan still needs to go through the standard environmental review process. So we’re going to see the advocacy groups again on that, and they will be joined by the people who live right along the route who want to protect their interests.

The four-mile widening targets the most problematic part of I-66 during rush hours eastbound. If you’re going to put new asphalt anywhere, do it between the Dulles Connector Road and Ballston, the stretch where masses of vehicles come together and maneuver to be in their best lanes.

The goal of the HOT lanes and of the widening project is to add capacity to the highway. It just depends on how you define “capacity.” The extreme faction for widening defines capacity strictly as more lane space. They mean capacity for more cars. The HOT lanes advocates, on the other hand, talk about more people-moving capacity. You can do that with fewer cars, by managing traffic, making it easier to carpool and adding commuter buses.

Advocates for widening reacted more positively to the governor’s announcement.

“This compromise solution will relieve congestion by adding much needed highway and transit capacity to the region’s most congested transportation corridor sooner, rather than later,” said a statement from the Northern Virginia Transportation Alliance. “This is an excellent example of executive-legislative, bipartisan cooperation to advance the greater public good.”

State Sens. J. Chapman “Chap” Petersen (D-Fairfax), Jennifer T. Wexton (D-Loudoun) and Jeremy McPike (D-Prince William) — all representing Northern Virginia districts outside the Beltway — issued a collective statement saying in part that, “For years, our constituents have faced an impenetrable wall of traffic where I-66 meets the Dulles Toll Road and then drops down to two travel lanes. This area is a tangible barrier that has historically inhibited outside-the-Beltway drivers from traveling to Arlington or the District of Columbia.”

Those who gave top billing to the car alternatives contained in the HOT lanes plan were less enthusiastic. “We are deeply disappointed by legislators of both parties,” read the collective response of the Coalition for Smarter Growth, the Virginia Chapter of the Sierra Club and the Southern Environmental Law Center. The groups acknowledged that the governor made a political compromise that preserved the HOT lanes plan, with its out-of-the-car options, but added, “We urge legislators to understand that an economically successful region like ours cannot build our way out of congestion through highway expansion.”

None of those people will stop caring about I-66. And then, there are the commuters, the people who will actually determine what happens along the interstate. Leaving aside transportation ideology, people studying the I-66 problem don’t profess to being dead certain about what’s going to happen.

The variable toll is supposed to regulate traffic flow, but it will take a while to get the rates right. The hours for tolling or free HOV use will be 5:30 to 9:30 a.m. eastbound and 3 to 7 p.m. westbound, so will we see early and late traffic surges at the edges of those times?

Millions of dollars will be spent to develop the carpool and commuter bus options, but will travelers use them?

Will the widening, supposed to be done by the end of 2019, give the long-distance commuters what they want? No matter how wide the interstate is, it’s still going to be open only to those who meet the high-occupancy vehicle rules or pay the toll.

This is why no transportation plan is ever really done. You make a decision, see what happens, then you tinker. I-66 inside the Beltway is only nine miles long, but it’s a never-ending story.

Photo courtesy of Matt McClain. Click here to read the original story.