Author: Veronica Miniello

Editorial: More Than a Day To Fix Metrorail

Yesterday’s unprecedented closure of the full D.C. regional Metrorail system to examine and make critical fixes to the system certainly disrupted the routines of many thousands in the region. While the move was affirmed by every responsible public official, even seasoned commuters who’ve grown dependent on the system have had to concede that there can be no serious complaining about fixes done in the name of safety.

But the one-day interruption could be raising more questions than it answers. Can WMATA’s new general manager Paul Wiedefeld say with confidence that the corrections made in that one day were really sufficient to fix everything wrong or potentially dangerous that should require attention? Concerns may actually arise in the face of this action that it was merely a band aid, or even simply cosmetic.

It cannot be stressed too much that the public must demand the WMATA leadership not try to cover up for the stingy U.S. Congress that needs to bear the burden for keeping the system going. Underfunding on infrastructure in this nation is a scandal, whether it is in Flint, Michigan or anywhere else. The idea of burdening local jurisdictions with the cost of maintaining vital components of major infrastructure projects is also a joke. Passing the buck like that is almost like not funding at all.

Stewart Schwartz, executive director of the Coalition for Smarter Growth, said this about yesterday’s closure of Metro: “It took years for Metrorail to end up in this situation, where maintenance underfunding left us with the problems we see today. Clearly, we have a ways to go to repair Metro’s aging systems….We hope that the ongoing challenges facing Metro will prompt our elected leaders to work together to provide the funding necessary to fix longstanding maintenance and rehabilitation problems. Failure is not an option.”

Underfunding has not only led to an aging system sorely in need of rehabilitation and maintenance, it has also led to the general under-performance of the system from the start. The system has been held back terribly by underinvestment, especially to be able to provide the necessary frequency and extension of hours of operation to make it a genuine alternative for many, many more in the region than use it, or rarely use it, now.

The biggest difference between the Metrorail here and the subway system in New York, where it really works for a population five times larger than here, has nothing to do with the amount of graffiti on its station or rail car walls. It has to do with the fact that the system is extremely passenger-centric, offering a frequency of trains and expanded hours of operation to make it indispensable to the average New Yorker.

The problem with WMATA and other mass transit options and plans around here is that they pull their punches badly and thereby present a shadow of what the region really needs. No one-day patchwork fixes can solve this endemic problem.

Click here to read the original story.

Is The Metro Closure A Good Idea Or A Really Bad One?

Yep, Metrorail is closed for all of Wednesday for an emergency investigation into the safety of the cables.

Was this a responsible decision or an insane one?
GOOD
“While I am disappointed that the closure of the Metro system has become necessary, I support the new management’s decision to take whatever steps are necessary to keep Virginians safe. Metro is essential to the economic health and quality of the Northern Virginia region and our entire Commonwealth – it’s time to make it the safe, accessible and dependable asset Virginia families deserve.”—Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe
“As civil engineers, we applaud the General Manager’s dedication to safety, as we believe and take an oath to protect the public’s health, safety, and welfare. This emergency closure demonstrates the immense investment and maintenance needs of our aging infrastructure.”—American Civil Society of Engineers

“It’s sad that it’s come to this, but hundreds of thousands of people depend on the safety of the Metro system. We need to take it seriously. I’m glad that Metro’s new leadership is treating system safety with an appropriate sense of urgency.”—Senator Mark Warner (VA)
“Whether they know it or not, Metro riders would rather have one day without Metro than an open-ended series of breakdowns, meltdowns, and potentially fatal incidents, like the one that killed Carol Glover in January 2015, when a stalled Yellow Line train filled up with smoke from a nearby track fire … Metro’s move is the right one. It will be painful temporarily, but if it works out, it should reduce the number of future delays because of shoddy third-rail wiring.”—Washingtonian
BAD
“Metro is a national embarrassment … It’s utterly hopeless for residents of the Washington area to think they can rely on Metrorail as a dependable form of transportation.”—Washington Post Editorial Board
“For a long time Marylanders have been denied the safe, reliable and efficient Metro system that they deserve. It is deeply disturbing that the system is in such a precarious state that it must be entirely and abruptly shut down during the middle of a workweek. This is a stark demonstration of a total agency failure; now is the time for every stakeholder in WMATA to demand better performance and improved safety.”—Maryland Congressman John Delaney
SOMEWHERE IN BETWEEN
“Certainly, we will see on Wednesday just how important Metro is to our region – to our transportation system and our economy. We may also realize amid the expected traffic gridlock tomorrow why dedicated bus lanes would offer a great way to move more people, faster and more reliably than the current bus in traffic model.”—Coalition for Smarter Growth
“Metro’s safety record has been a longstanding and well-documented concern for residents throughout the entire region. While I do not discount the challenges that lie ahead for WMATA, I am deeply concerned by the recent decision to close the entire Metrorail system. As Chairperson of the Committee on Education, my primary concern is ensuring that our students can get to school safely. As many of you know, the District of Columbia does not have a traditional school bus system and many of our 87,000 public school students rely on public transportation to get to school on time. I understand that this is a significant disruption for many of our families.”—At-large Councilmember David Grosso
“I appreciate that General Manager Paul Wiedefeld’s actions, while drastic, are being taken first and foremost to protect Metro Rail riders’ safety. At the same time this unprecedented action highlights the fundamental cultural change that needs to take place at Metro. Instead of Metro riders being constantly inconvenienced and put in danger, Metro management throughout the entire system needs to be shaken to its core and be rid of its culture of incompetence. New accountability measures must be put in place.”—Virginia Congresswoman Barbara Comstock
GIVE US MORE!
“WMATA needs to consider shutting down large portions of its rail system for a lot longer than a day. Several months may in fact be required for each line in order to perform complete safety and reliability overhauls.”—CityLab

Photo courtesy of Dan Lawrence 62. Click here to read the original story.

 

How Not to Think about Mass Transit

Michael Paul Williams, a feature columnist for the Richmond Times-Dispatch, takes a dim view of a decision by the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors to discontinue a subsidized bus route between downtown Richmond and Chesterfield Plaza. “Chesterfield, despite its dramatic demographic shifts and an increasing poverty rate, continues to turn a blind eye to residents who don’t own cars due to choice, age, disability or the inability to afford one,” he writes in his column today.

He indicts Chesterfield’s decision without ever revealing (a) how much it costs to maintain the service, (b) how many passengers used the service, or (c) how much the subsidies amount to per passenger, much less asking (d) how such a sum might be spent more beneficially in other ways.

The prospect of such reasoning taking hold in the Richmond region and driving the expenditure of real money should be terrifying in the extreme to anyone who objects to the squandering of tax dollars on symbolic gestures rather than on remedies that actually work. Walk with me through his column and despair.

Williams writes:

The supervisors gutted the budget of the Route 81 Express, creating the ridership decline they used to justify killing it. What exactly did the board expect from a route that offered one round-trip in the morning and a single one-way trip from downtown Richmond to Chesterfield in the afternoon with no stops in between? The board couldn’t have undermined the bus route more effectively if it had let the air out of the tires.

He has a point. Sort of. True, the route structure was idiotic. From Williams’s account, it sounds like the Chesterfield supervisors were trying to provide mass transit on the cheap and the route was doomed to fail. The obvious solution, however, is to pull the plug on the project before wasting any more money — just what the board did. The alternative is to double up on a bad situation, spending money to beef up the schedule or add interconnecting lines in the hope of creating critical mass. But what would such an arrangement look like, how much money would it cost, and how many people would be likely to ride that route? Just how much money does Williams propose throwing at the problem?He doesn’t say. He just wants more.

Williams brushes close to enlightenment when he quotes Jesse W. Smith, Chesterfield’s transportation director: “The county really doesn’t have the density to support traditional bus service.”

Bingo. The rule of thumb is that people are willing to walk 1/4 mile to avail themselves of mass transit. If 500 people live within a 1/4-mile radius of a bus stop, that represents far fewer potential customers than if, say, 2,500 people live within a 1/4-mile radius.  It also matters how walkable the streetscapes are. Are there sidewalks? If so, are they set away from streets with cars whizzing by at 45 miles per hour? When pedestrians cross the street, do they feel like they’re taking their lives into their hands? Is the walk visually interesting or is the view monotonous and undifferentiated?

Chesterfield is the epitome of the autocentric suburb. Given decades of low-density, hop-scotch, pedestrian-unfriendly development, Chesterfield County has a pattern of land use that is totally hostile to walkability and inappropriate for transit. Trying to implant mass transit in such an environment would be like planing a banana tree in Alaska: It can’t possibly thrive.

Chesterfield fully deserves criticism for its horrendous land use decisions, but that is no reason to compound the error by superimposing an unsuitable mass transit system. If Williams would like to spark a useful discussion, he could start by suggesting which transportation corridors might lend themselves to mixed-use development at higher densities that might one day, given sufficient redevelopment, support a bus line at reasonable cost.

“They’re shooting themselves in the foot,” Williams then quotes my old friend Stewart Schwartz, executive director of the Coalition for Smarter Growth, as saying. Williams summarizes Schwartz as making a point similar to one that I have often made on this blog:

In today’s competitive marketplace for corporations and employees, the suburban office park model of the late 20th Century is fading fast as companies seek to appeal to a millennial workforce that increasingly eschews the automobile and would rather walk, bike or ride mass transit to work. From Charlotte to Phoenix to Denver to Cleveland, “elected officials and business leaders recognize that transit provides a competitive edge,” Schwartz said.

That’s all very true. But it’s also totally irrelevant to Chesterfield. The transit systems he mentions serve areas that have far more people within walking distance of their bus stops than Chesterfield can ever think to have. Buses and Bus Rapid Transit might make sense in Richmond’s urban core (assuming City Council enacts appropriate zoning and invests in walkable streetscapes) but none at all in Chesterfield.

Williams then quotes former Sen. John Watkins, a Republican who represented Chesterfield County, who “was a lonely voice in the wilderness on the need for mass transit” (and who also was a prime mover behind the Rt. 288 corridor that opened up vast new swaths of the county to autocentric development). When he joined the legislature in the 1980s, Watkins observed, Fairfax County was adamant about not wanting buses, “and how they’re the biggest user of transit dollars in the state.”

Here’s the flaw with that comparison: Fairfax County had a population density of 2,862 inhabitants per square mile in 2014; Chesterfield had a population density of 742. Fairfax had nearly four times the population density! Moreover, there are sections of Fairfax that have far higher density than the average, while population in Chesterfield is smeared uniformly across the landscape. Buses make far more economic sense in Fairfax than Chesterfield.

Yes, Chesterfield has made a mess of itself. Yes, Chesterfield has created a land use pattern that makes life difficult for poor people lacking access to automobiles. But, no, compounding one folly with another is not an answer. Chesterfield needs to develop corridors of high-density, mixed-use development capable of supporting mass transit before adding new bus routes. Only then will the cost-benefit ratios look remotely favorable.

There are currently no comments highlighted.

Click here to read the original story.

Metro Executes Unprecedented Rail Shutdown For Safety Inspections Wednesday

Updated 7 p.m.

WMATA has closed the entire Metrorail system Wednesday to conduct emergency inspections of more than 600 electrical cable connections, the transit agency said.

The commuter rail system will be closed in D.C., Maryland and Virginia from midnight Tuesday through 5 a.m. Thursday. The Office of Personnel Management said federal agencies will be open Wednesday but employeeshave the option for unscheduled leave or telework.

Metro’s general manager, Paul Wiedefeld, announced the shutdown at a news conference Tuesday afternoon. Officials said it was the first time Metro would close all of its railways for any reason other than a weather emergency.

A fire on the tracks near the McPherson Square station led to major delays throughout the system Monday. The incident was traced to a faulty “jumper cable,” the same kind of electrical component that is believed to have malfunctioned last year and caused a train to fill with smoke near L’Enfant Plaza, killing one passenger and sickening dozens.

National Transportation Safety Board investigatorsidentified the need for the safety fix last year, and last June Metro’s top engineer Rob Troup cautioned that repairs requiring track shutdowns during daytime hourswould be necessary.

Wiedefeld said the threat to life is low in this case, but he was taking no chances with the safety of Metro riders and staff.

The ripple effects

Almost anyone who needs to navigate D.C. on a weekday will be affected by the decision, and there will be far more cars on the road than usual. Authorities were urging commuters to have patience. In a nod to the increased usage of roads, WMATA said parking would be free at all Metro-owned lots and garages Wednesday.

D.C. Public Schools announced they would still be open Wednesday, and were working with Metro to offer additional bus service. Tardies and absences will be excused, the school district said. As of Tuesday evening, a handful of the city’s public charter schools had canceled classes. About 87,000 students attend some form of public school in D.C.

The D.C. city government also will be open.

The VRE rail service announced it will continue to operate normal service Wednesday. The Maryland Transportation Authority said all three MARC rail lines would be operating at full service with “limited extra capacity.” Bus users should be prepared for delays because of heavy traffic, MTA said.

One type of vehicle will definitely not be on the city’s roads: The District will not send out street sweepersWednesday.

Tough decision, strong reactions

U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said in a written statement that the shutdown highlights the need for “a permanent Metro safety office with real teeth.” The secretary has been outspoken in pushing for the transit agency’s jurisdictions to create such an entity. “While this shutdown is inconvenient, they are doing the right thing by putting the safety of their passengers and workers first,” Foxx said.

Rep. Gerry Connolly, a Virginia Democrat whose district includes thousands of federal workers, called Metro’s decision “a gut punch to the hundreds of thousands of commuters who depend on the system.” In an an interview with WAMU 88.5 News, he called it a “sad, sad day.”

An advocacy group said it was hopeful the Metro closure will encourage elected officials to support more public funding for mass transit system maintenance. The Coalition for Smarter Growth, which says its mission is to promote pedestrian- and transit-friendly communities, said in a news release that Wednesday’s unprecedented shutdown is the result of maintenance underfunding through the years.

The group credited Metro leadership for taking the “tough and bold steps” to shut the system down for an inspection.

The shutdown is likely to be a boon for taxi and ridesharing companies. Roy Spooner, general manager of Yellow Cab of D.C., said he’s calling in extra staff to help take phone calls. He sent word to his drivers to get ready for Wednesday.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Photo courtesy of Martin Di Caro. Click here to read the original story.

The Latest: DC Suspends Street Sweeping to Ease in More Cars

The Latest on the decision to shut down the entire DC subway for a full day to allow inspections (all times local):

———

7:15 p.m.:

Metro’s closure Wednesday will have a sliver of a silver lining.

The DC Department of Public Works said Tuesday it will ease off on street sweeping violations during the Metro shutdown with the expectation that more parking spaces will be needed for commuters driving to work. That also means residential street sweeping will be suspended on Wednesday.

The DPW stresses, however, that violations such as an expired parking meter and parking in a crosswalk will be enforced.

Normal parking enforcement and street sweeping will resume on Thursday.

———

6:50 p.m.:

An advocacy group says it’s hopeful Metro’s closure on Wednesday will encourage elected officials to support more public funding for mass transit system maintenance.

The Coalition for Smarter Growth said in a news release Tuesday that the decision to darken Metro for a full day is the result of maintenance underfunding through the years. It credited Metro leadership for taking the “tough and bold steps” to shut the system down for an inspection.

The coalition says its mission is to promote pedestrian- and transit-friendly communities. It urged Washingtonians and commuters to turn to buses, carpools, walking and biking while Metro is out of commission.

———

6:30 p.m.:

With the district’s commuter rail system out of service until Thursday, federal workers are being told they can take an unscheduled leave or telework on Wednesday.

The announcement was made Tuesday by the Office of Personnel Management.

Spokesman Samuel Schumach says those two options are intended to help ease commuting problems related to Metro’s closure.

———

6 p.m.:

Washington’s public schools will remain open Wednesday, despite Metro’s shuttering for an inspection.

In a statement, District of Columbia Public Schools said it is working with Metro to add additional bus service.

Because of the mass-transit shutdown, school division spokeswoman Michelle Lerner said students who are late or absent will be excused because of the difficulty some parents will face getting their children to class.

Lerner said the D.C. schools have 48,589 students. Public charter school students push the district’s total attend to more than 87,000.

The U.S. Office of Personnel Management has not yet made an announcement about whether it will close federal government offices.

———

5:20 p.m.:

Commuters are dreading a day without their Metro.

Justice Department intern Atlee Ahern says the system is used by virtually everyone to get to their jobs. When Metro is shut down, she said the whole city shuts down.

Ahern rides Metro from her home in Bethesda, Maryland. She said she did not see how it would be possible for her to get to the office. She was hoping the federal government would grant unscheduled leave or telework, as two congressmen have suggested.

Metro’s closure is likely to be a boon for taxi and ridesharing companies.

Roy Spooner is general manager of Yellow Cab of D.C. He said he’s calling in extra staff to help take phone calls and sent word to his drivers to get ready for Wednesday.

———

5 p.m.:

The head of the rail system that serves the nation’s capital and its Virginia and Maryland suburbs says the system will shut down for a full day after a fire near one of the system’s tunnels.

Metro head Paul J. Wiedefeld said the system would be shut down all of Wednesday. He made the announcement at a news conference Tuesday afternoon at the agency’s headquarters.

The shutdown comes after a fire broke out Monday about 4:30 a.m. in the tunnel outside the McPherson Square station in downtown Washington. The fire led to delays on the orange, blue and silver lines, which go through the station.

———

4:20 p.m.

An official briefed on the decision says the entire Washington, D.C., subway system will shut down for at least 29 hours to inspect electrical components on the tracks.

The official spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because the official was not authorized to release the information ahead of a planned news conference at 4:30 p.m.

The official says the Metro subway system will shut down at midnight Tuesday and remain closed until at least 5 a.m. Thursday, which is the regularly scheduled opening time.

A fire on the tracks led to major delays throughout the system on Monday. The fire was caused by the same kind of electrical component that malfunctioned last year, causing a train to fill with smoke inside a downtown Washington tunnel.

Click here to read the original story.

With no idea how to get to work, Metro riders bemoan late notice of shutdown

Metro passengers and local lawmakers were trying to shake off their shock and plan alternative commutes for Wednesday morning after authorities announced that the region’s sprawling rail system would close at midnight and remain completely shuttered for 24 hours.

The Office of Personnel Management said that federal government employees could telework to avoid what could be crippling traffic jams in the nation’s capital, but several local school systems, including D.C. Public Schools, announced they would remain open Wednesday, posing a challenge for students and teachers who depend on Metro to get to class.

Metro’s unprecedented closure immediately drew complaints and concern. Riders asked why Metro hadn’t announced the shutdown earlier in the day Tuesday to give passengers more time to plan for a midweek standstill, and some said they are worried about what the episode says about the system’s overall safety.

Many in the Washington region were left with a simple quandary: How would they get to where they need to go on Wednesday without Metro, the linchpin in a public transit system that connects the District and its traffic-choked Maryland and Virginia suburbs?

“It’s going to affect our workday for sure,” said Henrik Sundqvist, who lives with his wife in Arlington, Va. Because the two have one car between them and work in opposite ends of the region — he in Dunn Loring in Fairfax County and she in Anacostia in the District — he said he has no idea how they would get to work.

The closure, which will allow Metro to inspect the lines amid concerns about the system’s electrical cables, might disrupt hundreds of thousands of lives Wednesday, but officials said it was in the interest of not putting anyone at risk on the rails.

Former U.S. transportation secretary Ray LaHood praised Metro’s leadership, including General Manager Paul J. Wiedefeld, for putting safety first.

“When you discover a potential threat to safety, you must do everything in your power to act,” LaHood said. “While the shutdown is obviously disruptive to the daily commutes of many Washingtonians, it is far better to be inconvenienced than to risk another life-threatening incident.”

Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) also said he supported Wiedefeld’s decision to “take whatever steps are necessary to keep Virginians safe.”

But he and many other local, state and federal lawmakers said that the shutdown should serve as a wake-up call that Metro is a troubled agency in need of serious reforms.

“It is deeply disturbing that the system is in such a precarious state that it must be entirely and abruptly shut down during the middle of a workweek,” Rep. John Delaney (D-Md.) said in a statement. “This is a stark demonstration of a total agency failure.”

In a statement, Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) called the closure “an astonishing admission that safety has not been the priority it needs to be at WMATA,” the Washington Area Metropolitan Transit Authority.

Rep. Gerry E. Connolly (D-Va.) said the announcement, which he learned of from a note passed to him on the House floor, was a “gut punch” that raises many questions.

“Was there no alternative? Is this, moving forward, how we’re going to deal with major repairs when something happens?” Connolly said. “Safety has to come first, but this must be an extreme situation to justify shutting down the entire system. And when you shut down Metro, as my colleagues here are going to learn tomorrow, you essentially shut down the federal government.”

Lawmakers from outside the Washington region took notice, as well. Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.), a noted transit advocate, said he was “deeply concerned” by the shutdown of a system that serves members of Congress, their staff members and the federal government at large.

“It’s a very serious signal,” Blumenauer said. “We’ve known that there have been problems for a whole host of reasons. . . . But I am hopeful that everybody in Congress pays attention to that, because we all live here a third of the time. This transit system is the transit system for our employees, for the federal workforce, and it’s in desperate need of everybody’s attention.”

Were his hometown of Portland to shut down its light-rail system on a weekday, he said, “it would have extraordinarily serious consequences.”

Jim Dinegar, president of the Greater Washington Board of Trade, said he is concerned that the shutdown will have a chilling effect on tourism in the short and the long term. Metro’s inspections on Wednesday could turn up new problems that further shake public confidence in the troubled rail system, he said. “They won’t find good things,” he said. “They’ll find risks.”

Many Metro advocates and passengers said the shutdown is a sign of the need for greater public investment in the system.

“We will see on Wednesday just how important Metro is to our region,” said Stewart Schwartz, executive director of the Coalition for Smarter Growth. “We hope that the ongoing chal­lenges facing Metro will prompt our elected leaders to work together to provide the funding necessary to fix long-standing maintenance and rehabilitation problems.”

During Tuesday’s evening commute, passengers were just beginning to grapple with how important Metro is to them on a daily basis — and in particular how important it would have been to them Wednesday.

Janice Williams, a house cleaner from Hyattsville, Md., said she will have to take three buses to get to work Wednesday. She was frustrated but said she is glad officials erred on the side of safety.

“It sucks that it has to happen, but you don’t want to worry about people getting hurt,” Williams said, sitting on a concrete bench in the Metro Center station. “There could be worse things.”

Michael Laurion, 26, who is in town from Dallas for an accounting conference in Arlington, said he had planned to take the Orange Line on Wednesday morning from his downtown hotel.

Now the only thing he knows for certain is that he will be late.

He said he still loves the District and is even thinking of moving here. But the fire that paralyzed three Metro lines on Monday and now the 24-hour shutdown have given him pause about the city’s public transit.

“It makes me wonder how safe, I guess, it really is,” Laurion said.

Others received the news with resignation, having been disappointed by Metro many times before.

Heather Bodenhamer, 24, said she has experienced her fair share of delays and poor service and smoke on the tracks during the past five years. She used to travel from Rockville, Md., to Clarendon in Arlington for work, and because of frequent Metro troubles, she had to leave her home two or three hours early to ensure she would arrive at work on time.

“There were so many times I was late to work,” she said. “It’s sad how unreliable it can be. You never know what’s going to happen.”

Heidi Schriefer said she considers herself one of the lucky ones. She has several options for commuting to work and won’t be terribly thrown off the by the shutdown. Instead, she plans to take a bus from her home in Old Town Alexandria to her office in downtown Washington.

“A lot of other people won’t be able to make it in,” she said. “It’s just irritating that they announced it last minute, on a weekday, and it will affect the whole system.”

That, she said, is the Metro trifecta.

Click here to read the original story.

Williams: On GRTC, Chesterfield must truly buy in

When Chesterfield County pulled the plug on a GRTC Transit System route last week, it again demonstrated its utter unwillingness to buy into a service it bought decades ago.

In 1989 — a century after Richmond established the first viable electric streetcar system in the world — the Chesterfield Board of Supervisors agreed to purchase $50,000 in stock to join Richmond as equal partners in what was then the Greater Richmond Transit Co.

“It seems to me that the county bought into co-ownership of the bus company for one of three reasons: (1) make an investment, (2) be a good neighbor, or (3) use their power as half owner to control the routes,” said John Moeser, senior fellow at the Bonner Center for Civic Engagement at the University of Richmond and an emeritus professor of urban studies at Virginia Commonwealth University. “It’s just a guess, but based on what I know about city-county relationships, public transit, and self-interest, I choose No. 3.”

Last Wednesday, the Chesterfield Board of Supervisors unanimously voted to discontinue by July the Route 81 Express from Chesterfield Plaza to downtown Richmond. That will leave it with one subsidized line connecting the county to the city — Route 82 Express, which runs from the Commonwealth 20 movie theater to downtown Richmond.

“One day, I hope we can have regional transportation, but it is not sustainable right now,” Supervisor James M. “Jim” Holland said.

The puddles in the boardroom were from crocodile tears.

The supervisors gutted the budget of the Route 81 Express, creating the ridership decline they used to justify killing it. What, exactly, did the board expect from a route that offered one round-trip in the morning and a single one-way trip from downtown Richmond to Chesterfield in the afternoon, with no stops in-between? The board couldn’t have undermined the bus route more effectively if it had let the air out of the tires.

As Richmond and Henrico County embark on a bus rapid transit system that is ultimately envisioned to reach Short Pump, it’s unimaginable that GRTC Pulse — with its dedicated lanes and light-rail style stations — will find its way to Midlothian Turnpike or Hull Street Road.

Chesterfield’s steadfast reluctance to use the transit system it co-owns is like a restaurant partner refusing to patronize the establishment because he or she doesn’t like the service or the price of the entrees.

“We’re part owner, but from a service standpoint it’s no different than anyone else,” said Jesse W. Smith, transportation director for Chesterfield. “If Henrico has a line, they have to pay for it. If we have a line, we have to pay for it.”

Well, why not buy more lines?

“The county really doesn’t have the density to support traditional bus service,” Smith said.

I’m not alone in seeing the county’s approach on mass transit as the myopic byproduct of a bygone era.

“They’re shooting themselves in the foot,” said Stewart Schwartz, executive director of the Coalition for Smarter Growth. He observed that in today’s competitive marketplace for corporations and employees, the suburban office park model of the late 20th Century is fading fast as companies seek to appeal to a millennial workforce that increasingly eschews the automobile and would rather walk, bike or ride mass transit to work.

From Charlotte to Phoenix to Denver to Cleveland, “elected officials and business leaders recognize that transit provides a competitive edge,” Schwartz said. And while white-collar commuters increasingly covet alternatives to the automobile, “on the lower-income side, access to jobs and affordable transportation has been studied and found to be a primary tool in enabling people to escape poverty.”

Smith notes that the county is starting to see higher-density areas such as Stonebridge, a mixed-use community at the site of the old Cloverleaf Mall, and Meadowville Technology Park, site of the Amazon Fulfillment Center. It is also studying the Jefferson Davis Highway area of North Chesterfield.

“Transit is certainly difficult to make work in what really is a suburban locality. … We’re going to take a hard look at what makes sense here,” Smith said. “Then the question is, ‘How do you fund it?’”

Mass transit lines can be had at a fraction of the millions of dollars it costs to widen roads and build interchanges. But Chesterfield’s leadership has been loath to see mass transit for what it is — a public service requiring public infrastructure and, of course, public subsidy.

For decades, then-state Sen. John Watkins, a Republican who represented Chesterfield, was an often lonely voice in the wilderness on the need for mass transit.

“I did everything I could during my tenure in the legislature to try to keep things going, to no avail,” said Watkins, who retired last year.

He noted that when he joined the legislature in the 1980s, Fairfax County was adamant about not wanting buses, “and now they’re the biggest user of transit dollars in the state.”

“I think time is going to take us there. But it just wasn’t ready when some of us who were looking forward thought we should be getting ready. But you look at the millennials, they want transit. And I just hope that at some point we come to a point in time when we can say that is a more efficient way to do it. And we just don’t seem to be there yet.”

Watkins notes that Petersburg desperately needs a better connection to Richmond. He’s happy to see the advent of local bus rapid transit. “But until it starts crossing those lines into Henrico and into Chesterfield, it’s going to be limited.”

Pulling the plug on this bus route sends the wrong signal as the city and its surrounding counties work on a Richmond Regional Transit Vision Plan. Chesterfield, despite its dramatic demographic shifts and an increasing poverty rate, continues to turn a blind eye to residents who don’t own cars due to choice, age, disability or the inability to afford one.

Unfortunately, regional mass transit doesn’t work without meaningful cooperation from Chesterfield, the region’s most populous locale.

Until the county gets on board, Greater Richmond’s mass transit will be less than the sum of its parts.

Photo courtesy of Daniel Sangjib. Click here to read the original story.

New Metro Boss Promises Focus On ‘Nuts And Bolts’ To Win Back Commuters

Metro’s new general manager outlined a broad agenda in his first major remarks since taking the job in November, promising to improve rail service for customers and create transparency across the troubled transit authority.

Speaking at a luncheon televised live on CSPAN-2 from the National Press Club, Paul Wiedefeld said Metro’s problems are worse than the public has been led to believe, but his focus will be on short-term fixes to convince riders that their time and safety on the rail lines are paramount.

Metro is “not coming out with a five-year plan. We have those things in place. It’s really about the nuts and bolts of where we can start to make changes that can impact the customer,” Wiedefeld said.

On Sunday the new boss of the second-busiest subway system in America, whose bus and paratransit arms combine with rail to employ 13,000 people, posted an open letter to riders outlining a 28-point plan to fix rail operations and Metro’s shaky finances. Now, the challenge is convincing labor unions, politicians, and riders to go along with it.

“We’ve called for a team effort. The general manager is doing his part. Obviously the management that work for him and the line staff have to do their part, and the unions, the business community and most importantly, the elected officials,” said Stewart Schwartz of the Coalition for Smarter Growth, a transit advocacy group.

Jim Dinegar, the president of the Greater Washington Board of Trade, a business group, also applauded Wiedefeld’s comprehensive approach.

“Metro is the economic engine that drives this region and without it we are crippled,” Dinegar said. “It is not lost of me that [ridership] has really slid. That is a very big concern. We are not just losing them to Uber. We are not just losing them to bikes. People have had shaken confidence in Metro. We have to restore that confidence.”

Much of Wiedefeld’s remarks touched on the system-wide problems detailed in a consultancy’s report obtained by WAMU 88.5 last month. The consulting firm, McKinsey & Company, is expected to provide a series of recommendations in the coming weeks, but Wiedefeld already is implementing changes to his upper management team with promises to overhaul an ineffective management structure at WMATA.

Among the new general manager’s near-term challenges is reigning in unsustainable expenses, which mostly are driven by growing labor costs. The contracts for three unions, including ATU Local 689 which represents about 8,000 workers, expire in June. Negotiations are expected to ramp up soon.

Photo courtesy of Martin Di Caro. Click here to read the original story.