Category: Loudoun & Prince William

Pageland Lane residents see renewal of old fight against Bi-County Parkway in Pr. William


Page Snyder, a longtime resident of Pageland Lane across from the Manassas Battlefield, points to where a proposed four-lane highway would cut through swaths of historic rural farmland. (Jeremy Borden – The Washington Post)

Legendary activist Annie Snyder, before she died in 2002, told her daughter that a road she battled against for decades would never come to fruition.

Snyder spent her life advocating for the preservation of rural lands, particularly those around the Civil War battlefields in Manassas near her home. She doubted that those who wanted to build a 10-mile Bi-County Parkway — which would skirt the battlefield and sit near the front of the Snyders’ family farm — would ever get the funds for such a controversial project, which would run from I-66 in Prince William County to Route 50 in Loudoun County.

The north-south route, supporters say, would create jobs and drive area economic development, ease congestion and provide a key connection between two rapidly growing counties. Detractors, including conservationists and smart growth advocates, say the road would be a boon to rural area land speculators, open up a rural area to development, and bring even more congestion that would result from a large Northern Virginia highway.

It would skirt hallowed Civil War ground, and resistant neighbors bristle at the thought of a four-lane highway competing with what is now bucolic spareness in their front yards.

Page Snyder, Annie Snyder’s daughter, now finds herself ensnared yet again in the fight, and she says she feels that the scales are tipped well in favor of the road. The road’s supporters — namely the administration of Gov. Robert F. McDonnell (R) — have little in their way of seeing the road through, she said.

Still, she’s not resigned. “We’ve won many lost causes that nobody thought we could win,” Snyder said. Since the 1960s, a shopping mall, large cemetery and dirt bike track, among others, have been proposed for nearby lands and were defeated.

While the road project has been with planning boards since the 1980s, several recent events have caused Snyder and others to see Bi-County Parkway (which is often called the Tri-County Parkway because past alignments brought it through Fairfax County) as increasingly a done deal.

In May of 2011, the Commonwealth Transportation Board declared the area as part of a north-south “Corridor of Significance” that could eventually connect Dulles Airport with Interstate 95 and provide a more easily accessible cargo hub, a concept that has wide support among many conservatives and business groups across the state. The National Park Service has largely agreed to the project, and a federal review that assesses the impacts of the roads, called a “section 106” review, is well under way. Officials say they hope to have it completed and signed off on by federal agencies this summer.

Also, last week, the CTB formally adopted a minor tweak in the road’s alignment to avoid a historic property. All told, residents are preparing for the reality of the road even as they continue to fight it.

If the road is built, Pageland Lane residents want to ensure that it does not cut off their access to surrounding roads. They said language in state documents gives the impression that the neighborhood would be cut off, without access to U.S. 29 and the surrounding community. Some alignment proposals could have them getting on the parkway simply to get off to go in the opposite direction.

Those access problems would have other effects. “We have our life’s savings in [our property],” said Mary Ann Ghadban, who lives on Pageland Lane. “If we don’t have access, our property is totally devalued.”

Maria Sinner, a VDOT official who helps oversee projects in Prince William, said that VDOT has not designed or engineered the road’s specifics yet. She said that the state is doing what it can to assure that Pageland Lane residents maintain access to U.S. 29 and the surrounding community.

“We’re going to do anything possible to continue to provide them access,” Sinner said.

There are still key hurdles to the parkway’s construction, even as the McDonnell administration sees the road as a “high priority,” said Sinner. The biggest is the road’s price tag: $300 million. A new funding plan for Virginia transportation means that some long-delayed projects should move forward, but there are competing needs, Sinner said.

“The administration has a high priority on this, but we know they don’t have $300 million right off the bat,” she said. So far, $5 million has been allocated for design work, and officials hope to get about another $15 million for studies this June, subject to a decision by the Commonwealth Transportation Board, the governing body that controls VDOT.

That board is lead by its chairman, Transportation Secretary Sean Connaughton, a former Prince William supervisor, who has long advocated for the road.

“It is our desire to fund and build it as soon as practical,” Connaughton said in an e-mail.

Still, residents feel that VDOT has not been straightforward with them. Del. Timothy D. Hugo (R-Fairfax), whose district includes the area, has scheduled a town hall meeting on Monday at 7 p.m. at Bull Run Middle School with VDOT officials to address concerns.

Stewart Schwartz, the executive director of the Coalition for Smarter Growth, said that the north-south connection when most residents travel east-west in notorious traffic conditions is a waste of state resources. He has called the parkway the “Zombie Road” — because, he says, it’s not needed, and it never dies.

The road, officials say, was formally approved in 2005 and should rightfully be on its way toward construction.

Photo courtesy of Washington Post

Read the original article here >>

NCRTPB votes to consider new access roads for Dulles airport

The National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board voted unanimously Wednesday to approve studying multiple proposals for new access roads on the west side of Dulles International Airport.


Dulles International Airport. Photo: Wikimedia Commons/Joe Ravi CC-BY-SA-30

As a critical hub for trade and commerce, Dulles needs more access roads for cargo trucks, planners say.

Advocates argue that more access roads could mean more cargo trucks, which could mean more trade in an international economy.

“If we don’t improve access to it and the other airports, we’re going to find our economic growth declining,” says Leo Schefer, Washington Airports Task Force president.

But not everyone is in agreement. Opponents point to the price tag, potentially hundreds of millions of dollars.

“At a time when we’re starved for transportation dollars, why are we diverting so much money to these roads on the backside of the airport instead of fixing 66, finishing paying for Dulles rail, revitalizing Route 1 in Fairfax, just dozens and dozens of projects that have not been funded,” says Stewart Schwartz, Coalition for Smarter Growth executive director.

In the hundreds of public comments, residents who oppose the proposed access roads call this a foot in the door toward the creation of what they call an “outer beltway.”

But board chair and Loudoun County Supervisor Scott York says that is not the plan.

“I hope all would understand that this is about supporting the growth of the international airport,” York says.

“The real goal is additional road investment on the backside of the airport to open up the rural areas of Loudoun County and Prince William County to more development,” Schwartz says. “Which is gonna mean more traffic upstream as well.”

Today’s vote means transportation planners will study several alternatives, including the two new access roads or possibly doing nothing at all.

VDOT will then select a preferred alternative before the board votes in July on its long-range transportation plan.

Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons/Joe Ravi CC-BY-SA-30

Read the original article here >>

Residents Seek Answers About ‘Outer Beltway’ During Forum

More than 150 people gathered in the auditorium of John Champe High School Monday night to learn more about the state’s plans to build a new highway across Loudoun and Prince William counties.

For most in the room, there were more questions than answers, even for program organizers—longtime critics who have been fighting the project they call the Outer Beltway in its many forms since the late 1980s.

The latest version is the Commonwealth Transportation Board’s designated Corridor of Statewide Significance, called the North-South Corridor, which would link I-95 to near Dumfries to Rt. 7 east of Leesburg. Options to develop a four- to six-lane road that would provide a new western access to Dulles Airport has been under study for the past year.

In Prince William County, detailed planning already is under way to extend the Prince William County Parkway from its I-66 terminus to Rt. 50 in Loudoun, including a Manassas Battlefield bypass that would have north-south traffic skirt the western edge of the national park along Pageland Lane and Sanders Lane. That road would link to Northstar Boulevard and then to Belmont Ridge Road in Loudoun. From there, an eastern spur, either along Rt. 50 or to the north, would move traffic to Rt. 606 and Dulles Airport.

In Loudoun, communities have already gotten communication from VDOT about studies that will be conducted between through April, including ones for wetland delineation, noise monitoring, culture resource surveys such as shovel tests, soil samples and/or hazardous waste investigations, according to a letter received by the Brambleton Group.

The Brambleton Community Association has already taken action to oppose the alternative that would bring the limited-access highway through the southern part of the community.

“The Board took this action because they feel that the construction of this highway will have long lasting and negative impacts on our community,” Brambleton General Manager Rick Stone said in a letter to residents. The letter goes on to note a limited-access road could reduce property values, increase noise related to truck traffic, negatively impact the environment and change future planned uses for the property included in the study area.

“The BCA Board believes that VDOT should focus their study to the existing right-of-ways along Route 50 (already planned as a limited access road) and on the airport property for which the road will serve,” the letter reads.

Piedmont Environmental Council President Chris Miller and Coalition for Smarter Growth Executive Director Stewart Schwartz told the audience Monday night the project, with a price tag that could exceed $1 billion, would do little to reduce commute times or spur job growth. They also questioned a key underpinning of the state’s push build the road, dismissing as “overstated” the claims that the highway was needed to accommodate growing cargo shipments at Dulles Airport.

Residents wanted to know more about the specific alignments the road would take and how their properties and their neighborhoods would be impacted.

“I don’t think they know and I don’t think VDOT will tell you,” Miller said. “But you should start asking.”

Also making presentations during the session were John Hutchison of Aldie Heritage Association and Charlie Grymes, chairman of the Prince William Conservation Alliance.

Hutchison raised concerns that the highway would undermine efforts to create a rural experience that would attract tourist seeking to escape urban environments. The project was cited as the association’s top concern by members during a recent meeting, he said.

Grymes said the North-South Corridor project would do little to create new jobs in Prince William County and would conflict with the county’s strategic plans. “We should invest where we can grow jobs,” he said, adding that focus should be in the I-95 and Rt. 1 corridors at the eastern end of the county. “If you spend your money on a dumb road you don’t need, you don’t have any left,” he said.

VDOT planners held two community open house meetings on the project in Loudoun and Prince William just before Christmas and the public comment period ended Jan. 18. Representatives from VDOT, the Department of Aviation, Department of Rail and Transportation and Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority are formulating recommendations for the Commonwealth Transportation Board.

Photo courtesy of Leesburg Today

Read the original article here >>

Last Day for Input on 2012 Study on Dulles Bi-County Corridor

Jan. 2, 2013 is the last day for citizens to voice their opinions on the new Bi-County, formerly Tri-County North/South Dulles Corridor, for a 2012 General Assembly report. Northern Virginia Transportation Alliance, a nonprofit group of business people and residents within Northern Virginia, recommends residents demonstrate their support for the corridor by sending a message to Governor McDonnell. “The North/South Corridor is critical to the future of Dulles Airport, and the future of Dulles Airport is critical to Northern Virginia and the entire Commonwealth,” said Bob Chase, President of NVTA.

Plans for Loudoun-Prince William highway move forward; crossing to Md. under discussion

The major North-South highway that is being planned for Loudoun and Prince William counties got a public rollout of sorts last week. “Open houses” were held at Stone Bridge High School in Ashburn and the Four Points Sheraton in Manassas. There were no formal presentations for this new “Northern Virginia North-South Corridor,” just a series ofinformational boards that showed roughly where the limited-access highway would go and why local and state officials think it’s needed.

This is not just the previously discussed Tri-County Parkway between I-66 and Route 50. This is the whole enchilada: a 45-mile limited-access highway from Route 7 in Ashburn all the way to I-95 in Dumfries. And the discussion is now officially beginning about extending this road across the Potomac River into Maryland, which makes the warnings from environmental and smart-growth groups of an emerging “Outer Beltway” connecting with the Intercounty Connector and then I-95 in Maryland seem more plausible.

Statement on VA Congressman regarding Route 460

VIRGINIA – Just last night Congressmen Scott, Moran and Connolly sent a joint letter to Governor McDonnell, the Federal Highway Administration and the Army Corps of Engineers, requesting information about the Route 460 project and the wetlands impacts and questioning the value of the project given the very low traffic projections and other needs in Hampton Roads and Northern Virginia. Yet, Governor McDonnell just announced today that his administration has signed the $1.4 billion contract for the project

Status Report: Northern Virginia Bi-County Parkway and North South Corridor of Statewide Significance

Status Report: Northern Virginia Bi-County Parkway and North South Corridor of Statewide Significance

The General Assembly of Virginia directed the Commonwealth Transportation Board, with assistance from the Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment, to conduct a comprehensive review of transportation needs in corridors of statewide significance and regional networks.

Lest we Forget … State of Virginia is at Fault for High Dulles Tolls

“The state has failed to provide a fair share toward Dulles Rail from its Transportation Trust Fund, saddling Northern Virginians with nearly the entire cost of Phase 2,” said Stewart Schwartz, Executive Director of the Coalition for Smarter Growth. “Meanwhile, VDOT is channeling state funds to speculative and unnecessary rural highway projects.

Comments on Draft Programmatic Agreement for the Tri-County Parkway in Prince William and Loudoun Counties, Virginia

Comments on Draft Programmatic Agreement for the Tri-County Parkway in Prince William and Loudoun Counties, Virginia

The following comments on the Draft Programmatic Agreement (PA) for the Tri-County Parkway (TCP) are submitted on behalf of the Southern Environmental Law Center, the Piedmont Environmental Council, the Coalition for Smarter Growth, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, and the National Parks Conservation Association. Our organizations recognize the irreplaceable value of Manassas National Battlefield Park (Battlefield).

Groups Urge Virginia to Stop Unnecessary Highway and Save Historic Battlefield

Contact:

Stewart Schwartz, CSG, 703-599-6437
Chris Miller, PEC, 703-507-5790
Jenni Brewer, NTHP, 202-588-6380
Pamela Goddard, NPCA, 202-454-3365
Morgan Butler, SELC, 434-977-4090

Groups Urge Virginia to Stop Unnecessary Highway and Save Historic Battlefield

 New Highway Proposed on Site of 150th Anniversary Weekend Reenactment of First Battle of Manassas

Washington, D.C. (July 21, 2011) – On July 23 and 24, 2011, thousands of Civil War reenactors will honor the 150th Anniversary of the First Battle of Manassas. Yet the Virginia Department of Transportation is pushing forward with the Tri-County Parkway, a proposal to build a segment of the Outer Beltway on the western boundary of Manassas National Battlefield, through a historic district and directly adjacent to the scene of fierce fighting in the Second Battle of Manassas.  Recently, Secretary of Transportation Sean Connaughton convinced the Commonwealth Transportation Board to establish a new “Corridor of Statewide Significance” through this area, fueling efforts to build the new highway.

This weekend’s reenactment will take place within sight of the proposed highway corridor and on the farm of the late Annie Snyder, known for her tenacious fights to protect Manassas Battlefield from highways, malls and other inappropriate development.

“We are deeply concerned about the significant damage this Tri-County Parkway project would have on the cultural and historic landscape of Manassas National Battlefield Park, the Manassas Battlefield Historic District and nearby historic properties. This plan would mean building directly on top of Manassas Battlefield Park, one of a few Civil War battlefield parks that includes the majority of the actual battlefield areas where troops formed, fought and died,” said Stephanie Meeks, president of the National Trust for Historic Preservation. “Why harm hallowed ground when a number of smaller scale fixes can serve the same purpose at a lower cost and still generate local jobs?”

“Manassas National Battlefield Park is an invaluable resource not only because of its history and meaning, but also because of its role in the local economy,” said Pamela Goddard of the National Parks Conservation Association.

According to the National Park Service, non-local visitors to the Park in 2009 spent $7.12  million, supporting  82 jobs and generating $2.7  million in labor income.”

“It is particularly disturbing that, on the sesquicentennial of the battles of First and Second Manassas, the Commonwealth of Virginia and the federal government would pursue construction of a major new highway along the western boundary of the Park and through the expanded Historic District, cutting across the historic approach of Stonewall Jackson’s troops to the Second Battle of Manassas,” said Chris Miller, president of the Piedmont Environmental Council.

The four to six lane highway would be part of a larger Outer Beltway proposal running from I-95 in Stafford, Virginia and/or Prince William to Route 7 and across the Potomac River.

“Proponents tie this controversial proposal to their goals to vastly expand Dulles Airport as a freight distribution center, meaning the new highway is intended to carry tens of thousands of trucks per year through the Manassas Battlefield historic district, forever destroying the quiet enjoyment of this hallowed ground,” said Stewart Schwartz, executive director of the Coalition for Smarter Growth. “We’ve long argued that this development model is at odds with the historic tourism value of the Battlefield and is a poor economic development approach compared to the far more productive future of our knowledge economy.”

According to Morgan Butler of the Southern Environmental Law Center, “the groups first offered a comprehensive set of alternatives in June 2005 that combined other regional and local transportation and land use improvements that would meet the project’s needs while also protecting the Battlefield.”

The combination of transportation and land use measures includes:

  • Improving I-66 to address the vast majority of traffic which is east-west,  including by extension of HOV and bus lanes;
  • Funding and expanding the capacity of the Gainesville Interchange in order to allow traffic to flow more smoothly to and from I-66;
  • Extending Virginia Railway Express to Gainesville and Haymarket, and improving bus transit along Route 50 in Loudoun County, I-66, and Route 28;
  • Targeting local road and safety improvements to cost-effectively reduce incidents in the high accident sections;
  • Protecting Prince William County’s Rural Crescent and the Loudoun Transition Zone from overdevelopment that would add more traffic to major east-west commuting routes, while shifting development to locations with enhanced access to transit;
  • Recognizing that local residents north of the Battlefield will have access to alternate shopping outlets, not requiring driving south through the Battlefield toManassas.  Those future locations include Loudoun’s Route 50 Corridor,Gainesville, and Haymarket; and,
  • Funding and completing the upgrade of Route 28 to improve access from the I-66 corridor to the major job concentrations east of Dulles Airport.
  • Upgrading local roads like Sudley Road north of the Park and Pageland Road west of the Park with shoulders and roundabouts at intersections (at 659 and Sudley; Sudley and Pageland; and 29 and Pageland)

This more comprehensive approach offers the most effective option for avoiding and minimizing harm to the Park, the Historic District, and the Pageland Road corridor.

“The Park remains a national treasure, a local amenity and a contributor to local economic vitality.  Elected and agency officials at all levels of government must work together with concerned citizens to protect its remaining integrity,” said Miller.

 

About the Coalition for Smarter Growth

The Coalition for Smarter Growth is the leading organization in the Washington D.C. region dedicated to making the case for smart growth. Our mission is to promote walkable, inclusive, and transit-oriented communities, and the land use and transportation policies needed to make those communities flourish. To learn more, visit the Coalition’s website at www.smartergrowth.net.

###